Modersohn D, Urbaszek W
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1975 Aug 1;30(15):502-6.
With the help of instances from literature and own experimental and clinical experiences is described that a schematic digitalisation in ischaemic heart diseases is not worth being advocated scientifically. Heart glycosides are indicated especially then, when a heart insufficiency stands in the foreground. In the acute phase of infarction, without manifest heart insufficiency, however, in individual cases they can deteriorate the myocardial oxygen balance and thus the clinical course. In myocardial infarction with severe heart insufficiency up to the cardiogenic shock all therapeutic possibilities should be utilized; to this belongs also the application of glycosides. As a rule in cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction glycosides have no sufficient measurable influence on haemodynamics. Heart glycosides together with an individually adapted kinetotherapy are of importance for the metaphylaxis in patients with infarction.
借助文献中的实例以及自身的实验和临床经验表明,缺血性心脏病中的示意性数字化在科学上不值得提倡。特别是当心力衰竭处于首要地位时,强心苷是适用的。然而,在梗死急性期,没有明显的心力衰竭,但在个别情况下,它们会恶化心肌氧平衡,从而影响临床病程。在伴有严重心力衰竭直至心源性休克的心肌梗死中,应利用所有治疗可能性;这也包括强心苷的应用。一般来说,心肌梗死后心源性休克时,强心苷对血流动力学没有足够可测量的影响。强心苷与个体化的运动疗法一起对梗死患者的预防很重要。