Adjei Alex A, Reid Joel M, Diasio Robert B, Sloan Jeff A, Smith Deborah A, Rubin Joseph, Pitot Henry C, Alberts Steven R, Goldberg Richard M, Hanson Lorelei J, Atherton Pamela, Ames Matthew M, Erlichman Charles
Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Department of Oncology, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15;20(6):1683-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.6.1683.
To compare the pharmacokinetics of continuous venous infusion (CVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of oral eniluracil/5-FU and to describe toxicities and clinical activity of prolonged oral administration of eniluracil/5-FU.
A randomized, open-label, cross-over study compared CVI 5-FU to an oral 5-FU/eniluracil combination. Seventeen patients (arm A) were randomly assigned to receive eniluracil/5-FU combination tablets (10:1 mg/m(2) BID for 7 days) during the first study period, followed by 5-FU (300 mg/m(2) CVI for 7 days) during period 2, with a 14-day washout between periods. Sixteen patients (arm B) received treatment in the opposite sequence. In period 3, all patients received eniluracil/5-FU tablets BID for 28 days. Plasma levels of 5-FU during CVI and oral administration were analyzed in periods 1 and 2. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity was determined by measuring plasma uracil, urinary alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine, and peripheral-blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) DPD activity.
There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities in either arm. Partial responses were observed in three patients. Another three patients had stable disease for > or = 3 months. Eniluracil and 5-FU pharmacokinetics were similar to those observed in previous studies and were unaffected by administration sequence. The mean +/- SD steady-state plasma concentration (C(P)) and area under the curve (AUC)(144-168h) for CVI 5-FU (104 +/- 45 ng/mL and 2,350 +/- 826 ng x h/mL, respectively) were three-fold greater than those for oral 5-FU (38.1 +/- 7.7 ng/mL and 722 +/- 182 ng x h/mL, respectively [P <.00001]). Individual 5-FU concentrations during CVI were highly variable, whereas those after eniluracil/5-FU were very reproducible. DPD activity in PBMCs before each study period was normal.
Both CVI 5-FU and oral eniluracil/5-FU were well tolerated, with moderate activity in these heavily pretreated patients. However, 5-FU steady-state C(P) and AUCs achieved with oral eniluracil/5-FU were significantly less than with CVI 5-FU.
比较持续静脉输注(CVI)氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)与口服依那西普/5-FU的药代动力学,并描述依那西普/5-FU长期口服给药的毒性和临床活性。
一项随机、开放标签、交叉研究比较了CVI 5-FU与口服5-FU/依那西普组合。17名患者(A组)在第一个研究期随机分配接受依那西普/5-FU组合片剂(10:1 mg/m²,每日两次,共7天),然后在第2期接受5-FU(300 mg/m²,CVI,共7天),两期之间有14天的洗脱期。16名患者(B组)接受相反顺序的治疗。在第3期,所有患者接受依那西普/5-FU片剂,每日两次,共28天。在第1期和第2期分析了CVI和口服给药期间5-FU的血浆水平。通过测量血浆尿嘧啶、尿α-氟-β-丙氨酸和外周血单核细胞(PBMC)二氢嘧啶脱氢酶(DPD)活性来测定DPD活性。
两组均无3级或4级毒性。3名患者观察到部分缓解。另外3名患者疾病稳定≥3个月。依那西普和5-FU的药代动力学与先前研究中观察到的相似,且不受给药顺序影响。CVI 5-FU的平均±标准差稳态血浆浓度(C(P))和曲线下面积(AUC)(144 - 168小时)(分别为104±45 ng/mL和2350±826 ng·h/mL)比口服5-FU(分别为38.1±7.7 ng/mL和722±182 ng·h/mL [P <.00001])高3倍。CVI期间个体5-FU浓度高度可变,而依那西普/5-FU后的浓度非常可重复。每个研究期前PBMC中的DPD活性正常。
CVI 5-FU和口服依那西普/5-FU耐受性均良好,在这些经过大量预处理的患者中具有中等活性。然而,口服依那西普/5-FU达到的5-FU稳态C(P)和AUC显著低于CVI 5-FU。