Imamura Y, Higuchi T, Otagiri M
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Japan.
J Enzyme Inhib. 2001 Nov;16(5):451-5. doi: 10.1080/14756360109162394.
Suprofen (SP) was little reduced by rabbit kidney carbonyl reductase, whereas its methyl ester (SPM) was an efficient substrate of the enzyme. To account for the differential catalytic activities for SP and SPM, the protective effects of these compounds against the inactivation of the enzyme by phenylglyoxal (PGO) were compared. Since the carboxyl group of SP is negatively charged and one essential arginine residue is known to be located in the NADPH-binding site of the enzyme, the protection of SP against the inactivation of the enzyme by PGO is expected to be more effective than that of SPM lacking a carboxyl group. However, the protective effects of SP and SPM were very similar. These results suggest that in spite of evidence for the binding of SP to the coenzyme-binding site, the carboxyl group of SP fails to interact with one essential arginine residue located in the site.
舒洛芬(SP)被兔肾羰基还原酶还原的程度很小,而其甲酯(SPM)是该酶的有效底物。为了解释对SP和SPM的不同催化活性,比较了这些化合物对苯乙二醛(PGO)使酶失活的保护作用。由于SP的羧基带负电荷,且已知一个必需的精氨酸残基位于该酶的NADPH结合位点,因此预计SP对PGO使酶失活的保护作用比缺乏羧基的SPM更有效。然而,SP和SPM的保护作用非常相似。这些结果表明,尽管有证据表明SP与辅酶结合位点结合,但SP的羧基未能与位于该位点的一个必需精氨酸残基相互作用。