Suppr超能文献

用于诊断原发性胆汁性肝硬化的自动化酶促线粒体抗体检测:一种检测抗线粒体抗体的常规诊断工具的应用

Automated enzymatic mitochondrial antibody assay for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis: applications of a routine diagnostic tool for the detection of antimitochondrial antibodies.

作者信息

Hazama Hiroaki, Omagari Katsuhisa, Masuda Jun-Ichi, Ohba Kazuo, Kinoshita Hideki, Matsuo Isao, Isomoto Hajime, Mizuta Yohei, Murase Kunihiko, Murata Ikuo, Kohno Shigeru

机构信息

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Mar;17(3):316-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02700.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

An automated enzymatic mitochondrial antibody assay (EMA) kit for the diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has become commercially available recently. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical utility of the enzyme inhibition assay using this EMA kit for the diagnosis of PBC.

METHODS

We tested the immunoreactivity of sera from 54 histologically confirmed Japanese PBC patients to the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complex (2-OADC) enzymes by enzyme inhibition assay using commercially available TRACE (EMA) assay kit, and compared the results with those of indirect immunofluorescence, commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using MESACUP Mitochondria M2 kit, and immunoblotting on bovine heart mitochondria.

RESULTS

Of the 54 sera, 43 (80%) were positive for antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) by immunofluorescence, 39 (72%) for enzymatic inhibitory antibody to pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) by EMA, 33 (61%) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) class anti-PDC antibody by ELISA, and 53 (98%) for IgG, IgM, or IgA class antibodies against at least one of the 2-OADC enzymes by immunoblotting. Of these, 43 (80%) were positive for IgG, IgM, or IgA class antibodies against the E2 subunit of PDC (PDC-E2) by immunoblotting. Thirty-six of the 54 sera (67%) showed identical results in all of the four assays, and 40 (74%) were all negative or positive by EMA, ELISA, and immunoblotting in PDC-relevant reactivity. There was a significant correlation between the number of detected immunoglobulin classes of anti-PDC-E2 by immunoblotting and anti-PDC by EMA (P < 0.0001), and a significant inverse correlation between IgG class anti-PDC by ELISA and units of PDC activity by EMA (r = -0.87, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although EMA had lower sensitivity compared with immunofluorescence and immunoblotting, this assay should be included among the routine diagnostic tools for the detection of AMA specific to PBC in clinical laboratories because of its high specificity, objective read-out, and rapid turnaround time.

摘要

背景与目的

一种用于诊断原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)的自动化酶促线粒体抗体检测(EMA)试剂盒最近已上市。本研究的目的是评估使用该EMA试剂盒的酶抑制试验在PBC诊断中的临床应用价值。

方法

我们使用市售的TRACE(EMA)检测试剂盒,通过酶抑制试验检测了54例经组织学确诊的日本PBC患者血清对2-氧代酸脱氢酶复合物(2-OADC)酶的免疫反应性,并将结果与间接免疫荧光、使用MESACUP线粒体M2试剂盒的商业酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及对牛心线粒体的免疫印迹结果进行了比较。

结果

54份血清中,免疫荧光法检测抗线粒体抗体(AMA)阳性43份(80%),EMA法检测丙酮酸脱氢酶复合物(PDC)酶抑制抗体阳性39份(72%),ELISA法检测免疫球蛋白G(IgG)类抗PDC抗体阳性33份(61%),免疫印迹法检测针对至少一种2-OADC酶的IgG、IgM或IgA类抗体阳性53份(98%)。其中,免疫印迹法检测针对PDC-E2亚基的IgG、IgM或IgA类抗体阳性43份(80%)。54份血清中的36份(67%)在所有四种检测中结果相同,40份(74%)在EMA、ELISA和免疫印迹法检测的与PDC相关的反应性中均为阴性或阳性。免疫印迹法检测到的抗PDC-E2免疫球蛋白类别数量与EMA法检测的抗PDC之间存在显著相关性(P < 0.0001),ELISA法检测的IgG类抗PDC与EMA法检测的PDC活性单位之间存在显著负相关(r = - 0.87,P < 0.0001)。

结论

尽管EMA法与免疫荧光法和免疫印迹法相比敏感性较低,但由于其高特异性、客观读数和快速周转时间,该检测方法应纳入临床实验室检测PBC特异性AMA的常规诊断工具之中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验