Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗近端左前降支与近端右冠状动脉及左旋支冠状动脉后使用支架与不使用支架的临床结局比较。

Comparison of clinical outcomes using stents versus no stents after percutaneous coronary intervention for proximal left anterior descending versus proximal right and left circumflex coronary arteries.

作者信息

Ashby Dale T, Dangas George, Mehran Roxana, Lansky Alexandra J, Narasimaiah Raj, Iakovou Ioannis, Polena Sotir, Satler Lowell F, Pichard Augusto D, Kent Kenneth M, Stone Gregg W, Leon Martin B

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Lenox Hill Heart and Vascualr Institute, New York, New York 10022, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2002 May 15;89(10):1162-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02297-x.

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that proximal left anterior descending (LAD) stenoses have higher rates of restenosis after angioplasty than stenoses in other coronary segments. Stenting strategies may reduce this high rate of LAD restenosis. The study population included 1,289 patients with proximal coronary artery stenoses treated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with or without stents for single-vessel coronary disease between 1994 and 1999. Patients were divided into 4 groups: non-stent PCI in the proximal LAD artery (n = 168), non-stent PCI in proximal right/circumflex artery (n = 217), stent in the proximal LAD artery (n = 364), and stent to proximal right/circumflex artery (n = 540). Procedural success was higher in the stenting groups, but there were no significant differences in the major in-hospital events between the different lesion locations among the groups. At 1-year follow-up, there was no difference in mortality or myocardial infarction between the groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR) in the patients with proximal LAD stents compared with the patients with proximal right/circumflex coronary artery stents (10.1% vs 13.8%, p = 0.11). In the patients who did not receive stents with proximal narrowings, there was a significant increase in TLR in the LAD group compared with the right/circumflex group (21.1% vs 12.5%, p = 0.04). Thus, patients with proximal stenoses treated with non-stenting strategies have lower procedural success than those treated with stenting strategies; the patients with proximal LAD non-stent PCI have significantly higher rates of clinical restenosis than patients with proximal right and circumflex stenoses. A stenting strategy for proximal LAD stenoses appears to attenuate the differences of clinical restenosis noted after non-stent PCI.

摘要

以往研究表明,与其他冠状动脉节段的狭窄相比,左前降支(LAD)近端狭窄在血管成形术后再狭窄率更高。支架置入策略可能会降低LAD的这种高再狭窄率。研究人群包括1994年至1999年间因单支冠状动脉疾病接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)(有或无支架)的1289例冠状动脉近端狭窄患者。患者分为4组:LAD近端动脉无支架PCI组(n = 168)、右冠状动脉/回旋支近端动脉无支架PCI组(n = 217)、LAD近端动脉支架置入组(n = 364)和右冠状动脉/回旋支近端动脉支架置入组(n = 540)。支架置入组的手术成功率更高,但各组不同病变部位之间的主要院内事件无显著差异。在1年随访时,各组之间的死亡率或心肌梗死无差异。与右冠状动脉/回旋支近端冠状动脉支架置入患者相比,LAD近端支架置入患者的靶病变血运重建(TLR)率无显著差异(10.1%对13.8%,p = 0.11)。在未接受近端狭窄支架置入的患者中,LAD组的TLR较右冠状动脉/回旋支组显著增加(21.1%对12.5%,p = 0.04)。因此,采用非支架置入策略治疗的近端狭窄患者的手术成功率低于采用支架置入策略治疗的患者;LAD近端无支架PCI患者的临床再狭窄率显著高于右冠状动脉和回旋支近端狭窄患者。LAD近端狭窄的支架置入策略似乎减弱了非支架PCI后观察到的临床再狭窄差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验