• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉形式失认症中对二维图像和三维物体的把握

Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.

作者信息

Westwood David A, Danckert James, Servos Philip, Goodale Melvyn A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5C2, Canada.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):262-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1068-y. Epub 2002 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-002-1068-y
PMID:12012164
Abstract

Visually guided prehension is controlled by a specialized visuomotor system in the posterior parietal cortex. It is not clear how this system responds to visual stimuli that lack three-dimensional (3D) structure, such as two-dimensional (2D) images of objects. We asked a neurological patient with visual-form agnosia (patient D.F.) to grasp 3D objects and 2D images of the same objects and to estimate their sizes manually. D.F.'s grip aperture was scaled to the sizes of the 2D and 3D target stimuli, but her manual estimates were poorly correlated with object size. Control participants demonstrated appropriate size-scaling in both the grasping and manual size-estimation tasks, but tended to use a smaller peak aperture when reaching to grasp 2D images. We conclude that: (1) the dorsal stream grasping system does not discriminate in a fundamental way between 2D and 3D objects, and (2) neurologically normal participants might adopt a different visuomotor strategy for target objects that are recognized to be ungraspable. These findings are consistent with the view that the dorsal grasping system accesses a pragmatic, spatial representation of the target object, whereas the ventral system accesses a more comprehensive, volumetric description of the object.

摘要

视觉引导的抓握动作由后顶叶皮质中的一个专门的视觉运动系统控制。目前尚不清楚该系统如何对缺乏三维(3D)结构的视觉刺激做出反应,例如物体的二维(2D)图像。我们让一位患有视觉形式失认症的神经学患者(患者D.F.)抓握3D物体以及相同物体的2D图像,并手动估计它们的大小。D.F.的抓握孔径与2D和3D目标刺激的大小成比例,但她的手动估计与物体大小的相关性很差。对照组参与者在抓握和手动大小估计任务中均表现出适当的大小缩放,但在伸手抓握2D图像时倾向于使用较小的峰值孔径。我们得出以下结论:(1)背侧流抓握系统在2D和3D物体之间不存在根本的区分,(2)神经功能正常的参与者可能会针对被认为无法抓握的目标物体采用不同的视觉运动策略。这些发现与以下观点一致,即背侧抓握系统获取目标物体的实用空间表征,而腹侧系统获取物体更全面的体积描述。

相似文献

1
Grasping two-dimensional images and three-dimensional objects in visual-form agnosia.视觉形式失认症中对二维图像和三维物体的把握
Exp Brain Res. 2002 May;144(2):262-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1068-y. Epub 2002 Apr 10.
2
Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study.枕叶腹侧病变损害物体识别但不损害物体导向抓握:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain. 2003 Nov;126(Pt 11):2463-75. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg248. Epub 2003 Sep 23.
3
Goal-directed grasping: the dimensional properties of an object influence the nature of the visual information mediating aperture shaping.目标导向性抓取:物体的维度属性影响调节开口形状的视觉信息的性质。
Brain Cogn. 2013 Jun;82(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 16.
4
DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues.DF 的视觉大脑在行动:触觉线索的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Mar;55:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
5
Patient DF's visual brain in action: Visual feedforward control in visual form agnosia.患者DF的视觉大脑活动:视觉失认症中的视觉前馈控制
Vision Res. 2015 May;110(Pt B):265-76. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.08.016. Epub 2014 Sep 6.
6
Visuomotor performance based on peripheral vision is impaired in the visual form agnostic patient DF.基于周边视觉的运动视觉表现受损,这在视觉形态不可知患者 DF 中表现明显。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jan;50(1):90-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
7
Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.在没有视觉的情况下抓握:对抓握孔径轮廓进行时间归一化会导致对目标大小的虚假抓握缩放。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1878-87. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.015. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
8
Visuomotor performance in a patient with visual agnosia due to an early lesion.一名因早期病变导致视觉失认症患者的视动功能
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jun;20(1):12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.12.007.
9
Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment.健康受试者在三维沉浸式虚拟环境与物理环境中进行抓握动作的比较。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Sep;138(1):126-34. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.05.015.
10
Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP.猴子顶叶AIP区神经元对用于抓握的物体的形状、大小和方向的选择性。
J Neurophysiol. 2000 May;83(5):2580-601. doi: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580.

引用本文的文献

1
Obstacle avoidance of physical, stereoscopic, and pictorial objects.物理、立体和图像物体的避障
Virtual Real. 2025;29(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10055-025-01119-y. Epub 2025 Mar 1.
2
Are reaching and grasping effector-independent? Similarities and differences in reaching and grasping kinematics between the hand and foot.伸手和抓握是否与效应器无关?手和脚在伸手和抓握运动学上的异同。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Jun;240(6):1833-1848. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06359-x. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
3
Unilateral resection of both cortical visual pathways in a pediatric patient alters action but not perception.
在一名儿科患者中双侧皮质视觉通路的单侧切除术改变了动作但没有改变感知。
Neuropsychologia. 2022 Apr 15;168:108182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108182. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
Manipulation of physical 3-D and virtual 2-D stimuli: comparing digit placement and fixation position.对物理 3-D 与虚拟 2-D 刺激的操控:比较数字放置与注视位置。
Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jun;239(6):1863-1875. doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06101-z. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
5
The Role of Haptic Expectations in Reaching to Grasp: From Pantomime to Natural Grasps and Back Again.触觉预期在伸手抓握中的作用:从模拟动作到自然抓握,再回归模拟动作
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 17;11:588428. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.588428. eCollection 2020.
6
Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping.无关情境对二维和三维抓握的不同影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Feb;80(2):564-575. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1443-1.
7
Weber's law in 2D and 3D grasping.二维和三维抓取中的韦伯定律。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):977-988. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0913-3. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
8
Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.预期性眼动注视揭示了工具交互中的工具知识。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Aug;234(8):2415-31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4646-0. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
9
Automatic adjustments toward unseen visual targets during grasping movements.抓握动作中对不可见视觉目标的自动调整。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jul;234(7):2091-2103. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4613-9. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
10
Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?启动工具动作:真实物体比图片更能有效地启动吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):963-76. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z. Epub 2015 Dec 21.