Suppr超能文献

在筛查乳糜泻时,人组织转谷氨酰胺酶酶联免疫吸附测定法比基于豚鼠的组织转谷氨酰胺酶测定法和抗肌内膜抗体检测法表现更优。

Human tissue transglutaminase enzyme linked immunosorbent assay outperforms both the guinea pig based tissue transglutaminase assay and anti-endomysium antibodies when screening for coeliac disease.

作者信息

Wolters Victorien, Vooijs-Moulaert Anne-Françoise, Burger Huib, Brooimans Rik, De Schryver Jan, Rijkers Ger, Houwen Roderick

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology (KE.01.147.0), UMC/Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Postbox 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2002 May;161(5):284-7. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-0933-9. Epub 2002 Mar 27.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Anti-endomysium antibodies (EMA) and antigliadin antibodies (AGA) are widely used when screening for coeliac disease (CD), although their specificity and sensitivity are suboptimal. The guinea pig tissue transglutaminase (tTG) assay also did not prove to be superior. A newly developed enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (Celikey), based on human tTG, might however have a better performance. We therefore investigated the sensitivity and specificity of this human IgA tTG assay in 101 patients with aspecific gastrointestinal complaints and compared this to guinea pig IgA tTG, AGA and EMA. A total of 52 patients with CD were investigated and 49 patients without CD. All had a small bowel biopsy. Our results showed that human IgA tTG had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 100%. Guinea pig IgA-tTG had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 92%. EMA had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 90%. Both IgA AGA and IgG AGA had a sensitivity of 83% whilst having a specificity of 86% and 80% respectively.

CONCLUSION

both the human IgA tissue transglutaminase enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and the guinea pig IgA tissue transglutaminase assay could better identify patients with coeliac disease than IgA anti-endomysium antibodies. Although in a larger series of control patients the specificity for the human IgA tissue transglutaminase enzyme linked immunosorbent assay might fall below 100%, in our opinion this is currently the serological method of choice in identifying patients with coeliac disease in the absence of IgA deficiency.

摘要

未标记

在筛查乳糜泻(CD)时,抗肌内膜抗体(EMA)和抗麦醇溶蛋白抗体(AGA)被广泛使用,尽管它们的特异性和敏感性并不理想。豚鼠组织转谷氨酰胺酶(tTG)检测也未被证明更具优势。然而,一种新开发的基于人tTG的酶联免疫吸附测定(Celikey)可能具有更好的性能。因此,我们研究了这种人IgA tTG检测在101例非特异性胃肠道不适患者中的敏感性和特异性,并将其与豚鼠IgA tTG、AGA和EMA进行比较。共研究了52例CD患者和49例非CD患者。所有患者均进行了小肠活检。我们的结果显示,人IgA tTG的敏感性为96%,特异性为100%。豚鼠IgA-tTG的敏感性为96%,特异性为92%。EMA的敏感性为92%,特异性为90%。IgA AGA和IgG AGA的敏感性均为83%,而特异性分别为86%和80%。

结论

人IgA组织转谷氨酰胺酶酶联免疫吸附测定和豚鼠IgA组织转谷氨酰胺酶测定在识别乳糜泻患者方面比IgA抗肌内膜抗体表现更好。尽管在更多对照患者中,人IgA组织转谷氨酰胺酶酶联免疫吸附测定的特异性可能会低于100%,但在我们看来,目前这是在不存在IgA缺乏的情况下识别乳糜泻患者的血清学首选方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验