Levine B, Green-Johnson D, Moore K A, Fowler D, Jenkins A
Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland, 111 Penn Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Sci Justice. 2002 Jan-Mar;42(1):17-20. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(02)71792-9.
Data was compiled from 126 morphine-involved cases investigated by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, State of Maryland, USA. An investigation was conducted into whether comparison of morphine concentrations from a central and peripheral site could be used to determine whether a morphine death was acute or delayed. Fifty cases were identified as 'acute' because the urine free morphine concentration by radioimmunoassay (RIA) was less than 25 ng/mL; 76 cases were classified as 'random' because they had a urine morphine concentration greater than 25 ng/mL by RIA. The average heart blood to peripheral blood morphine concentration ratio in the acute deaths was 1.40. The average heart blood to peripheral blood morphine concentration ratio in the random deaths was 1.18. Because there was considerable overlap between the two groups of data, the authors conclude that it was not possible to predict 'acute' opiate intoxication deaths versus 'delayed' deaths when the only information available is heart and peripheral blood free morphine concentrations.
数据来自美国马里兰州首席法医办公室调查的126起涉及吗啡的案件。对中央部位和外周部位吗啡浓度的比较是否可用于确定吗啡死亡是急性还是延迟进行了调查。50例被确定为“急性”,因为放射免疫分析(RIA)测定的尿游离吗啡浓度低于25 ng/mL;76例被归类为“随机”,因为RIA测定的尿吗啡浓度大于25 ng/mL。急性死亡病例中心脏血与外周血吗啡浓度的平均比值为1.40。随机死亡病例中心脏血与外周血吗啡浓度的平均比值为1.18。由于两组数据之间存在相当大的重叠,作者得出结论,当唯一可用的信息是心脏和外周血游离吗啡浓度时,无法预测“急性”阿片类药物中毒死亡与“延迟”死亡。