Strickland Judy A, Foureman Gary L
National Center for Environmental Assessment MD 52, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2002 Apr 8;288(1-2):51-63. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(01)01114-7.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Center for Environmental Assessment is engaged in the development of a methodology for Agency use to perform risk assessments for non-cancer effects due to acute inhalation exposures. The methodology will provide general guidance for deriving chemical-specific acute exposure benchmarks called acute reference exposures (AREs). Chemical-specific AREs are analogous to reference concentra tions (RfCs) for chronic non-cancer effects and will be incorporated in chemical-specific files in the US EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as they are developed and reviewed. AREs will have wide applicability in assessing the potential health risks of accidental and routine acute releases of chemicals to the environment. The proposed methodology for ARE development provides a framework for choosing an optimal derivation approach, depending on the type of data available, from the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL), benchmark concentration (BMC), or categorical regression approaches. Uncertainty factors are applied to the point of departure, determined by one of the recommended approaches, to derive the ARE. Due to the capability to use more exposure-response information than the NOAEL approach allows, exposure-response analyses such as BMC and categorical regression are favored as methods to develop the point of departure when the available database will support such analyses. The NOAEL approach is suitable when the data are insufficient to support exposure-response modeling. Applications of the proposed ARE methodology are illustrated by the derivation of example AREs for hydrogen sulfide and hexachlorocyclopentadiene, which showcase the categorical regression and NOAEL approaches, respectively. In addition, a recent review of the proposed ARE methodology by the US EPA Risk Assessment Forum is discussed.
美国环境保护局(EPA)国家环境评估中心正在开发一种方法,供该机构用于对急性吸入暴露导致的非癌症效应进行风险评估。该方法将为推导称为急性参考暴露量(AREs)的特定化学物质急性暴露基准提供一般指导。特定化学物质的AREs类似于慢性非癌症效应的参考浓度(RfCs),在其制定和审查后将纳入美国EPA综合风险信息系统(IRIS)中的特定化学物质文件。AREs在评估化学品意外和常规急性释放到环境中的潜在健康风险方面将具有广泛的适用性。拟议的AREs制定方法提供了一个框架,可根据可用数据的类型,从无观察到不良反应水平(NOAEL)、基准浓度(BMC)或分类回归方法中选择最佳推导方法。不确定性因素应用于由推荐方法之一确定的起始点,以推导AREs。由于能够使用比NOAEL方法允许的更多的暴露-反应信息,当可用数据库支持此类分析时,诸如BMC和分类回归等暴露-反应分析作为确定起始点的方法更受青睐。当数据不足以支持暴露-反应建模时,NOAEL方法是合适的。通过推导硫化氢和六氯环戊二烯的示例AREs来说明拟议的AREs方法的应用,它们分别展示了分类回归和NOAEL方法。此外,还讨论了美国EPA风险评估论坛最近对拟议的AREs方法的审查。