Alcántara José I, Moore Brian C J
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EB, UK.
Hear Res. 2002 Mar;165(1-2):103-16. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00291-5.
Masking patterns were measured for hearing-impaired subjects with varying degrees of hearing loss. In one set of conditions, three subjects were tested using narrowband noise ('noise') and sinusoidal ('tone') maskers and narrowband noise signals. The maskers had centre frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 4.0 kHz and levels of 60, 80 and 100 dB SPL. Masking patterns for both the noise and tone maskers showed irregularities ('dips'), especially for signal frequencies up to 500 Hz above the masker frequency. The irregularities occurred for all masker levels and for all subjects for at least one masker frequency and they occurred for a relatively constant range of masker-signal frequency separations, suggesting that they were the result of beat detection. In another set of conditions, masking patterns were measured using two subjects, for a 2.0-kHz tone masker with a level of 100 dB SPL and tone and noise signals. For the tone masker alone (baseline condition), the masking patterns again exhibited prominent dips above, and sometimes below, the masker frequency. The addition of a lowpass noise to the masker, intended to mask combination tones, had little effect for one subject. For the other subject, who had near-normal absolute thresholds at low frequencies, the noise elevated thresholds for masker-signal frequency separations between 500 and 1500 Hz. For this subject, an extra tone with a frequency equal to the masker-signal frequency separation, added in place of the lowpass noise, had a very similar effect to that produced by the lowpass noise, suggesting that he was detecting a simple difference tone in the baseline condition. The addition of a pair of high-frequency tones (MDI tones - intended to reduce the detectability of beats) to the masker elevated thresholds for signal frequencies from 1500 to 2500 Hz for one subject and from 1500 to 3500 Hz for another subject. The addition of lowpass noise and MDI tones to the masker produced masking patterns very similar to those observed when the MDI tones alone were added to the masker. Overall, the results suggest that the irregularities in the masking patterns were caused mainly by the detection of beats and not by the detection of combination tones.
对不同程度听力损失的听力受损受试者的掩蔽模式进行了测量。在一组条件下,使用窄带噪声(“噪声”)和正弦波(“纯音”)掩蔽器以及窄带噪声信号对三名受试者进行了测试。掩蔽器的中心频率为0.25、0.5、1.0和4.0千赫,声压级为60、80和100分贝声压级。噪声和纯音掩蔽器的掩蔽模式均显示出不规则性(“凹陷”),特别是对于高于掩蔽器频率500赫兹以下的信号频率。这些不规则性在所有掩蔽器声压级下以及至少一个掩蔽器频率下的所有受试者中均会出现,并且它们出现在掩蔽器 - 信号频率间隔的相对恒定范围内,这表明它们是拍频检测的结果。在另一组条件下,使用两名受试者对声压级为100分贝声压级的2.0千赫纯音掩蔽器以及纯音和噪声信号测量掩蔽模式。仅对于纯音掩蔽器(基线条件),掩蔽模式在掩蔽器频率之上,有时在其之下再次表现出明显的凹陷。向掩蔽器添加低通噪声以掩蔽组合音,对一名受试者几乎没有影响。对于另一名在低频处绝对阈值接近正常的受试者,该噪声提高了掩蔽器 - 信号频率间隔在500至1500赫兹之间的阈值。对于该受试者,添加一个频率等于掩蔽器 - 信号频率间隔的额外纯音来代替低通噪声,产生的效果与低通噪声产生的效果非常相似,这表明他在基线条件下检测到了一个简单的差频音。向掩蔽器添加一对高频纯音(MDI纯音 - 旨在降低拍频的可检测性),对于一名受试者,提高了1500至2500赫兹信号频率的阈值,对于另一名受试者,提高了1500至3500赫兹信号频率的阈值。向掩蔽器添加低通噪声和MDI纯音产生的掩蔽模式与仅添加MDI纯音时观察到的掩蔽模式非常相似。总体而言,结果表明掩蔽模式中的不规则性主要是由拍频检测引起的,而不是由组合音检测引起的。