Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
In re Estate of Prange.
North East Rep Second Ser. 1988 Feb 11;520:946-54.
2
In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange.
Issues Law Med. 1988 Summer;4(1):113-8.
3
In re Estate of Longeway.
North East Rep Second Ser. 1989 Nov 13;549:292-322.
4
In re Estate of Greenspan.
North East Rep Second Ser. 1990 Jul 9;558:1194-208.
5
In re Drabick.
Wests Calif Report. 1988 Apr 12;245:840-61.
6
The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
St Louis Univ Law J. 1986;30(3):805-32.
7
In re Gardner.
Atl Report. 1987 Dec 3;534:947-59.
8
Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
J Fam Law. 1991;30(1):111-33.
9
A line less reasonable: Cruzan and the looming debate over active euthanasia.
Md J Contemp Leg Issues. 1991 Summer;2(2):99-256.
10
In re Bayer.
Issues Law Med. 1987 Summer;3(1):79-84.
Zotero 插件