Scamporrino A, Occhigrossi G, Iannetti A, Marenga G, Serafini G, Stagnitti F
U.O. di Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Ospedale S. Pertini, Roma.
Ann Ital Chir. 2001 Nov-Dec;72(6):707-13; discussion 713-4.
Although endoscopic injection therapy is an effective method for bleeding peptic ulcers, it is associated with significant re-bleeding rate; whether the addition of thermal method improves the outcome is still unclear. Our previous experience showed that Argon Plasma Coagulation (APC) alone is not sufficient in stopping spurting haemorrhage, and potentially dangerous for large non bleeding visible vessels (NBVV). Our hypothesis was that combination of adrenaline injection (AI) and thermal therapy could be more efficient than thermal therapy alone for permanent haemostasis of active bleeding peptic ulcers, and particularly appropriate for NBVV treatment. From October 1998 to February 2000 we examined two hundred patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Fifty-three patients with major peptic ulcer haemorrhages received combined injection therapy with adrenaline 1:10.000 and Argon plasma coagulation; there were 34 male and 19 female with a mean age of 63.2 +/- 1.2 years (range 22-93). The bleeding site was duodenal in 30 patients, gastric in 17 patients, anastomotic in 5 patients and esophageal in 1 patient. Endoscopic findings were the following: active bleeding in 23 patients (6 spurting, 17 oozing), non bleeding visible vessels in 12 patients and fresh adherent clots in 18 patients. Initial haemostasis was achieved in 52/53 patients (98.1%). Re-bleeding was observed in 5/52 cases (9.6%). Surgery was necessary in 3/53 patients (5.6%). Mortality was 7.5% (4 cases). No major complications resulted from this treatment. Primary adrenaline injection provided initial bleeding arrest, facilitating the following application of APC, because of a more precise definition of the active bleeding site. Rates of initial hemostasis were significantly higher with combined therapy (injection + APC) compared to APC treatment alone. We believe that Adrenaline and APC combined therapy is an effective and safe method for treatment of non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding.
尽管内镜注射疗法是治疗消化性溃疡出血的有效方法,但它的再出血率较高;添加热凝方法是否能改善治疗效果仍不明确。我们之前的经验表明,单纯氩离子凝固术(APC)不足以止住喷射性出血,而且对于大的非出血性可见血管(NBVV)有潜在危险。我们的假设是,肾上腺素注射(AI)与热凝疗法联合应用对于活动性出血性消化性溃疡的永久性止血可能比单纯热凝疗法更有效,尤其适用于NBVV的治疗。1998年10月至2000年2月,我们检查了200例上消化道出血患者。53例主要消化性溃疡出血患者接受了1:10000肾上腺素与氩离子凝固术的联合注射治疗;其中男性34例,女性19例,平均年龄63.2±1.2岁(范围22 - 93岁)。出血部位十二指肠30例,胃17例,吻合口5例,食管1例。内镜检查结果如下:23例有活动性出血(6例喷射性,17例渗血),12例有非出血性可见血管,18例有新鲜附着血凝块。52/53例患者(98.1%)实现了初始止血。5/52例(9.6%)观察到再出血。3/53例患者(5.6%)需要手术治疗。死亡率为7.5%(4例)。该治疗未导致重大并发症。初次肾上腺素注射实现了初始止血,由于能更精确地确定活动性出血部位,便于随后应用APC。联合治疗(注射 + APC)的初始止血率明显高于单纯APC治疗。我们认为肾上腺素与APC联合治疗是治疗非静脉曲张性胃肠道出血的一种有效且安全的方法。