Crotty Maria, Whitehead Craig H, Gray Steven, Finucane Paul M
Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, Australia.
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Jun;16(4):406-13. doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr518oa.
To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture.
Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture.
Three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, Australia.
Sixty-six patients with fractured hip.
Patients assigned to the home-based rehabilitation group were discharged within 48 hours of randomization. The project team therapists made visits to the patient's home and negotiated a set of realistic, short-term and measurable treatment goals with both the patient and carer. Those randomized to usual care remained in hospital for conventional rehabilitation.
Physical and social dependence, balance confidence, quality of life, carer strain, patient and carer satisfaction, use of community services and incidence of adverse events such as re-admission and falls.
While there was no difference between the groups for all measures of quality of life, patients in the accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation group recorded a greater improvement in MBI from randomization (p < 0.05) and scored higher on the Falls Efficacy Scale (p < 0.05) at four months. There was no difference in falls rates. Patients in the home-based rehabilitation group had a shorter stay in hospital (p < 0.05) but a longer stay in rehabilitation overall (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable on the rate and length of admissions after discharge, use of community services, need for carer input and contact with general practitioner (GP) after discharge.
This trial further supports the practice of accelerated discharge from hospital and home-based rehabilitation in selected patients recovering from hip fracture. Such a practice appears to improve physical independence and confidence in avoiding subsequent falls which may have implications for longevity and overall quality of life.
比较髋部骨折患者在医院和家庭环境中的康复情况。
随机对照试验,比较髋部骨折入院患者的加速出院和居家康复(n = 34)与传统医院护理(n = 32)。
澳大利亚阿德莱德的三家都市医院。
66例髋部骨折患者。
分配到居家康复组的患者在随机分组后48小时内出院。项目团队治疗师前往患者家中,与患者及其护理人员协商制定一套现实、短期且可衡量的治疗目标。随机分配到常规护理组的患者留在医院接受传统康复治疗。
身体和社会依赖程度、平衡信心、生活质量、护理负担、患者及护理人员满意度、社区服务使用情况以及再入院和跌倒等不良事件的发生率。
虽然两组在所有生活质量指标上没有差异,但加速出院和居家康复组的患者自随机分组后在改良巴氏指数(MBI)上有更大改善(p < 0.05),且在四个月时跌倒效能量表得分更高(p < 0.05)。跌倒发生率没有差异。居家康复组患者住院时间较短(p < 0.05),但总体康复时间较长(p < 0.001)。两组在出院后入院的频率和时长、社区服务使用情况、护理人员投入需求以及出院后与全科医生(GP)的联系方面具有可比性。
该试验进一步支持了对髋部骨折康复期特定患者实施加速出院和居家康复的做法。这种做法似乎能提高身体独立性以及避免后续跌倒的信心,这可能对寿命和总体生活质量产生影响。