Brown S P, Loot G, Teriokhin A, Brunel A, Brunel C, Guégan J-F
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, UK.
Int J Parasitol. 2002 Jun 15;32(7):817-24. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(02)00013-9.
Previous investigations suggest that the infection of the cyprinid roach, Rutilus rutilus, with the larval plerocercoid forms of the cestode, Ligula intestinalis, creates behavioural and morphological changes in the fish host, potentially of adaptive significance to the parasite in promoting transmission to definitive avian hosts. Here we consider whether these behavioural changes are important in shaping the distribution of parasite individuals across the fish population. An examination of field data illustrates that fish infected with a single parasite were more scarce than expected under the negative binomial distribution, and in many months were more scarce than burdens of two, three or more, leading to a bimodal distribution of worm counts (peaks at 0 and >1). This scarcity of single-larval worm infections could be accounted for a priori by a predominance of multiple infection. However, experimental infections of roach gave no evidence for the establishment of multiple worms, even when the host was challenged with multiple intermediate crustacean hosts, each multiply infected. A second hypothesis assumes that host manipulation following an initial single infection leads to an increased probability of subsequent infection (thus creating a contagious distribution). If manipulated fish are more likely to encounter infected first-intermediate hosts (through microhabitat change, increased ingestion, or both), then host manipulation could act as a powerful cause of aggregation. A number of scenarios based on contagious distribution models of aggregation are explored, contrasted with alternative compound Poisson models, and compared with the empirical data on L. intestinalis aggregation in their roach intermediate hosts. Our results indicate that parasite-induced host manipulation in this system can function simultaneously as both a consequence and a cause of parasite aggregation. This mutual interaction between host manipulation and parasite aggregation points to a set of ecological interactions that are easily missed in most experimental studies of either phenomenon.
先前的研究表明,鲤科蟑螂(Rutilus rutilus)感染绦虫(Ligula intestinalis)的幼虫期裂头蚴会使鱼类宿主产生行为和形态变化,这可能对寄生虫向最终禽类宿主的传播具有适应性意义。在此,我们探讨这些行为变化是否对寄生虫个体在鱼群中的分布形成具有重要影响。对野外数据的检查表明,感染单个寄生虫的鱼比负二项分布预期的更为稀少,而且在许多月份中,比感染两个、三个或更多寄生虫的鱼更为稀少,导致蠕虫数量呈双峰分布(峰值出现在0和大于1)。单幼虫感染的这种稀少情况可以先验地由多重感染的优势来解释。然而,对蟑螂的实验性感染并未提供多重蠕虫定殖的证据,即使宿主受到多个中间甲壳类宿主的挑战,每个中间宿主都受到多重感染。第二个假设是,初始单感染后宿主的操控会导致后续感染的概率增加(从而形成传染性分布)。如果被操控的鱼更有可能遇到受感染的第一中间宿主(通过微生境变化、摄食量增加或两者兼而有之),那么宿主操控可能是聚集的一个重要原因。我们探讨了基于聚集传染性分布模型的多种情况,与替代的复合泊松模型进行对比,并与蟑螂中间宿主中肠舌绦虫聚集的实证数据进行比较。我们的结果表明,该系统中寄生虫诱导的宿主操控既可以作为寄生虫聚集的结果,也可以作为其原因同时发挥作用。宿主操控与寄生虫聚集之间的这种相互作用指向了一组生态相互作用,而这在大多数关于这两种现象的实验研究中很容易被忽视。