Zhukov D A, Vinogradova K P
Pavlov Institute of Physiology, St Petersburg, Russia.
Integr Physiol Behav Sci. 2002 Jan-Mar;37(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/BF02688804.
Researches on uncontrollable events in the post-soviet states are overviewed. In our research, susceptibility to learned helplessness is studied in rats with active (KHA strain) versus passive (KLA strain) coping styles. Inescapable footshocks, but not escapable footshocks, applied to KHA rats induced escape failures, diminished locomotion and coping, reduced measures of anxiety, and resulted in dexamethasone nonsuppression of the brain-hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis--all characteristic of learned helplessness. In contrast, KLA rats demonstrated the same responses upon exposure to both escapable and inescapable stresses. While learned helplessness occurred in KHA rats, it appears that KLA rats exposed to inescapable stress demonstrated learned inactivity based upon the nondifference between effects of escapable and inescapable shocks. Relationships between coping styles and social ranks are discussed. Our and other's results with genetically selected strains suggest active coping in dominant and subordinate subjects, and passive coping in subdominant animals confirm the importance of coping style and its relation to health under stress.
本文综述了对后苏联国家不可控事件的研究。在我们的研究中,我们研究了具有主动应对方式(KHA品系)和被动应对方式(KLA品系)的大鼠对习得性无助的易感性。对KHA大鼠施加不可逃避的电击,而不是可逃避的电击,会导致逃避失败、运动和应对能力下降、焦虑指标降低,并导致地塞米松对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴的抑制作用减弱——所有这些都是习得性无助的特征。相比之下,KLA大鼠在暴露于可逃避和不可逃避的应激时表现出相同的反应。虽然KHA大鼠出现了习得性无助,但暴露于不可逃避应激的KLA大鼠似乎表现出基于可逃避和不可逃避电击效果无差异的习得性不活动。文中讨论了应对方式与社会等级之间的关系。我们以及其他人对基因选择品系的研究结果表明,优势和从属个体采用主动应对方式,而次优势动物采用被动应对方式,这证实了应对方式的重要性及其与应激状态下健康的关系。