Ambrose Peter J, Saya Frank G, Lovett Larry T, Tan Sandy, Adams Dale W, Shane Rita
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, USA.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jun 15;59(12):1183-8. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/59.12.1183.
The accuracy rates of board-registered pharmacy technicians and pharmacists in checking unit dose medication cassettes in the inpatient setting at two separate institutions were examined. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, both in Los Angeles county, petitioned the California State Board of Pharmacy to approve a waiver of the California Code of Regulations to conduct an experimental program to compare the accuracy of unit dose medication cassettes checked by pharmacists with that of cassettes checked by trained, certified pharmacy technicians. The study consisted of three parts: assessing pharmacist baseline checking accuracy (Phase I), developing a technician-training program and certifying technicians who completed the didactic and practical training (Phase II), and evaluating the accuracy of certified technicians checking unit dose medication cassettes as a daily function (Phase III). Twenty-nine pharmacists and 41 technicians (3 of whom were pharmacy interns) participated in the study. Of the technicians, all 41 successfully completed the didactic and practical training, 39 successfully completed the audits and became certified checkers, and 2 (including 1 of the interns) did not complete the certification audits because they were reassigned to another work area or had resigned. In Phase II, the observed accuracy rate and its lower confidence limit exceeded the predetermined minimum requirement of 99.8% for a certified checker. The mean accuracy rates for technicians were identical at the two institutions (p = 1.0). The difference in mean accuracy rates between pharmacists (99.52%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 99.44-99.58%) and technicians, (99.89%; 95% CI 99.87-99.90%) was significant (p < 0.0001). Inpatient technicians who had been trained and certified in a closely supervised program that incorporated quality assurance mechanisms could safely and accurately check unit dose medication cassettes filled by other technicians.
对两个不同机构的住院部注册药房技术人员和药剂师检查单剂量药盒的准确率进行了研究。位于洛杉矶县的雪松西奈医疗中心和长滩纪念医疗中心,向加利福尼亚州药房委员会申请豁免《加利福尼亚法规法典》,以开展一项实验项目,比较药剂师检查的单剂量药盒与经过培训并获得认证的药房技术人员检查的药盒的准确率。该研究包括三个部分:评估药剂师的基线检查准确率(第一阶段),制定技术人员培训计划并对完成理论和实践培训的技术人员进行认证(第二阶段),以及评估获得认证的技术人员作为日常工作检查单剂量药盒的准确率(第三阶段)。29名药剂师和41名技术人员(其中3名是药房实习生)参与了该研究。在这些技术人员中,41人全部成功完成了理论和实践培训,39人成功完成审核并成为认证检查员,2人(包括1名实习生)未完成认证审核,因为他们被重新分配到另一个工作区域或已辞职。在第二阶段,观察到的准确率及其较低置信限超过了认证检查员预先设定的99.8%的最低要求。两个机构技术人员的平均准确率相同(p = 1.0)。药剂师(99.52%;95%置信区间[CI]99.44 - 99.58%)和技术人员(99.89%;95%CI 99.87 - 99.90%)的平均准确率差异显著(p < 0.0001)。在一个纳入了质量保证机制的密切监督项目中接受培训并获得认证的住院部技术人员,可以安全、准确地检查由其他技术人员装填的单剂量药盒。