Chen Nancy, Alarcon Pedro A, Comer Gail M, Tressler Randall L
Abbott Laboratories, Taipei, Taiwan.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002;11(2):151-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2002.00285.x.
The objective of this study was to test whether the gastrointestinal tolerance of a new infant formula equalled or exceeded the tolerance of other milk-based infant formulas, and to compare the tolerance of the new formula to that of human milk. This prospective, observational, multicenter, open-label study was conducted in Taiwan. Healthy, full-term infants aged 28-98 days were enrolled on their current feeding regimen (no treatment assigned). Feeding regimens included human milk (HM), a new infant formula (NF, Similac Advance), other marketed infant formulas (OF, mainly Enfalac or S-26, HM + NF and HM + OF. Data for stool frequency, stool consistency and gastrointestinal intolerance symptoms were recorded in study diaries by parents for a period of two weeks. Gastrointestinal tolerance was evaluated in 967 infants, of whom 481 (49.7%) received NF, 312 (32.2%) received OF, 101 (10.4%) received HM + NF, 41 (4.2%) received HM + OF and 32 (3.3%) received HM. Infants fed HM only had softer and more frequent stools than those who received NF only or OF only (P < 0.001). Infants fed NF only had softer stools than those fed OF only (P < 0.001), including those fed either Enfalac or S-26 (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between feeding groups for the incidence of general intolerance, spit-up or flatulence. All feeding regimens were well tolerated. We thereby concluded that NF is well tolerated in healthy infants and results in stool consistencies that more closely resemble those of infants fed human milk than those of infants fed other formulas.
本研究的目的是测试一种新的婴儿配方奶粉的胃肠道耐受性是否等于或超过其他基于牛奶的婴儿配方奶粉的耐受性,并将新配方奶粉的耐受性与母乳的耐受性进行比较。这项前瞻性、观察性、多中心、开放标签研究在台湾进行。纳入了年龄在28 - 98天的健康足月婴儿,按照他们当前的喂养方案(未分配治疗)。喂养方案包括母乳(HM)、一种新的婴儿配方奶粉(NF,Similac Advance)、其他市售婴儿配方奶粉(OF,主要是Enfalac或S - 26)、HM + NF和HM + OF。家长在研究日记中记录为期两周的大便频率、大便稠度和胃肠道不耐受症状的数据。对967名婴儿进行了胃肠道耐受性评估,其中481名(49.7%)接受NF,312名(32.2%)接受OF,101名(10.4%)接受HM + NF,41名(4.2%)接受HM + OF,32名(3.3%)接受HM。仅喂养HM的婴儿比仅接受NF或仅接受OF的婴儿大便更软且更频繁(P < 0.001)。仅喂养NF的婴儿比仅喂养OF的婴儿大便更软(P < 0.001),包括喂养Enfalac或S - 26的婴儿(P < 0.001)。各喂养组在总体不耐受、吐奶或腹胀发生率方面无显著差异。所有喂养方案耐受性良好。我们由此得出结论,NF在健康婴儿中耐受性良好,与其他配方奶粉喂养的婴儿相比,其大便稠度更接近母乳喂养婴儿的大便稠度。