Suppr超能文献

卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫的比较。

Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy.

作者信息

Tudur Smith C, Marson A G, Clough H E, Williamson P R

机构信息

Division of Statistics and Operational Research, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Mathematics & Oceanography Building, Peach Street, Liverpool, UK, L69 7ZL.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, carbamazepine and phenytoin are commonly used antiepileptic drugs. This review summarizes evidence from randomized controlled trials in which these two drugs have been compared.

OBJECTIVES

To review the best evidence comparing carbamazepine and phenytoin when used as monotherapy in subjects with partial onset seizures, or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures with or without other generalized seizure types.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: (a) the trial register of the Cochrane Epilepsy Group; (b) The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2001); (c) MEDLINE 1966-2001. In addition we hand searched relevant journals and contacted the pharmaceutical industry and researchers in the field to seek any ongoing or unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials in children or adults with partial onset seizures or generalized onset tonic-clonic seizures. Trials must have included a comparison of carbamazepine monotherapy with phenytoin monotherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

This was an individual patient data review. Outcomes were time to (a) withdrawal of allocated treatment, (b) 12 month remission, (c) six month remission, and (d) first seizure post randomization. Data were analysed using a stratified logrank analysis with results expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), where a HR>1 indicates an event is more likely on phenytoin.

MAIN RESULTS

Individual patient data are available for 551 participants from three trials, representing 63% of the participants recruited into the nine trials that met our inclusion criteria. By convention, for the outcomes time to six and 12 month remission HR>1 indicates a clinical advantage for phenytoin, whilst for time to withdrawal and first seizure HR>1 indicates a clinical advantage for carbamazepine. Results (HR (95% CI)) were: (i) time to withdrawal of allocated treatment 0.97(0.74 to 1.28), (ii) time to 12 month remission 1.00(0.78 to 1.29), (iii) time to six month remission 1.10(0.87 to 1.39), (iv) time to first seizure 0.91(0.74 to 1.12). The results suggest no overall difference between carbamazepine and phenytoin for these outcomes.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: We have not found evidence that a significant difference exists between carbamazepine and phenytoin for the outcomes examined in this review. Confidence intervals are wide and the possibility of important differences existing has not been excluded.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,卡马西平和苯妥英是常用的抗癫痫药物。本综述总结了比较这两种药物的随机对照试验证据。

目的

综述比较卡马西平和苯妥英作为单药治疗部分性发作或伴有或不伴有其他全身性发作类型的全身性强直阵挛发作患者的最佳证据。

检索策略

我们检索了:(a)Cochrane癫痫小组的试验注册库;(b)Cochrane对照试验注册库(Cochrane图书馆2001年第4期);(c)1966 - 2001年的MEDLINE。此外,我们还手工检索了相关期刊,并联系了制药行业和该领域的研究人员,以寻找任何正在进行或未发表的研究。

入选标准

针对部分性发作或全身性强直阵挛发作的儿童或成人的随机对照试验。试验必须包括卡马西平单药治疗与苯妥英单药治疗的比较。

数据收集与分析

这是一项个体患者数据综述。结局指标为:(a)分配治疗的撤药时间;(b)12个月缓解时间;(c)6个月缓解时间;(d)随机分组后的首次发作时间。数据采用分层对数秩分析进行分析,结果以风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)表示,其中HR>1表明苯妥英治疗时事件更有可能发生。

主要结果

来自三项试验的551名参与者的个体患者数据可用,占符合我们纳入标准的九项试验中招募参与者的63%。按照惯例,对于6个月和12个月缓解时间的结局,HR>1表明苯妥英具有临床优势,而对于撤药时间和首次发作时间,HR>1表明卡马西平具有临床优势。结果(HR(95%CI))为:(i)分配治疗的撤药时间0.97(0.74至1.28);(ii)12个月缓解时间1.00(0.78至1.29);(iii)6个月缓解时间1.10(0.87至1.39);(iv)首次发作时间0.91(0.74至1.12)。结果表明,在这些结局方面,卡马西平和苯妥英之间没有总体差异。

综述作者结论

我们未发现证据表明在本综述所考察的结局方面,卡马西平和苯妥英之间存在显著差异。置信区间较宽,未排除存在重要差异的可能性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验