Ramaker C, Hilten J J
Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, Leiden, Netherlands. J.J.van
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD003634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003634.
Drugs that mimic dopamine such as bromocriptine were introduced as monotherapy or in a combination with LD in the hope that this approach would prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, hitherto, the role of bromocriptine (BR) in this issue has remained controversial. The present study is a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials of bromocriptine/levodopa (BR/LD) combination therapy compared with levodopa (LD) monotherapy in PD.
To assess the efficacy and safety of BR/LD combination therapy in delaying the onset of motor complications associated with LD monotherapy in patients with PD.
Sources including the Cochrane Library, the search strategy of the Movement Disorders Group (includes computerised searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE and hand searching of appropriate neurology journals), reference lists of the reviews found by the MEDLINE and EMBASE search-strategy, Sandoz -now Novartis- (manufacturer of BR), PPD Pharmaco, symposia reports, PD handbooks, contacts with colleagues who had co-ordinated trials on BR and reference lists of all included studies were used to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interest.
Randomised trials were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the efficacy of BR/LD combination therapy for delaying the onset of motor complications compared to LD monotherapy in PD patients. Outcome measures that were evaluated included occurrence and severity of motor complications, scores on impairment and disability, and the occurrence of side effects and dropouts.
To determine the feasibility of a quantitative systematic review two independent reviewers evaluated the methodological quality of identified trials.
The methodological quality of five trials showed important shortcomings. All studies failed to adequately describe randomisation procedures. Only two were carried out according to a double-blind design. Differences between studies concerning the mean age of the patients, the BR titration phase, the maximum achieved daily dose of LD (62.5-1000 mg) and BR (5-50 mg), and the applied outcomes were found. Our results show no evidence of consistent differences concerning the occurrence and severity of motor complications, scores of impairment and disability and the occurrence of side effects between both treatment groups.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review found no evidence in support of early bromocriptine/levodopa combination therapy as a strategy to prevent or delay the onset of motor complications in the treatment of PD.
诸如溴隐亭等模拟多巴胺的药物被用作单一疗法或与左旋多巴联合使用,希望这种方法能够预防或延缓帕金森病(PD)患者运动并发症的发生。然而,迄今为止,溴隐亭(BR)在这个问题上的作用仍存在争议。本研究是对所有比较溴隐亭/左旋多巴(BR/LD)联合疗法与左旋多巴(LD)单一疗法治疗PD的随机对照试验的系统评价。
评估BR/LD联合疗法在延缓PD患者与LD单一疗法相关的运动并发症发生方面的疗效和安全性。
检索来源包括考克兰图书馆、运动障碍小组的检索策略(包括对MEDLINE和EMBASE的计算机检索以及对相关神经学期刊的手工检索)、MEDLINE和EMBASE检索策略所找到的综述的参考文献列表、桑多兹公司(现为诺华公司,BR的制造商)、PPD Pharmaco、研讨会报告、PD手册、与曾协调BR试验的同事的联系以及所有纳入研究的参考文献列表,以识别感兴趣的随机对照试验(RCT)。
如果随机试验评估了BR/LD联合疗法与LD单一疗法相比在延缓PD患者运动并发症发生方面的疗效,则有资格纳入。评估的结局指标包括运动并发症的发生情况和严重程度、损伤和残疾评分以及副作用和退出情况的发生。
为了确定定量系统评价的可行性,两名独立的评价者评估了所识别试验的方法学质量。
五项试验的方法学质量显示出重要缺陷。所有研究均未充分描述随机化程序。只有两项是按照双盲设计进行的。发现各研究在患者平均年龄、BR滴定阶段、LD的最大每日剂量(62.5 - 1000毫克)和BR的最大每日剂量(5 - 50毫克)以及所应用的结局指标方面存在差异。我们的结果表明,没有证据表明两个治疗组在运动并发症的发生情况和严重程度、损伤和残疾评分以及副作用的发生方面存在一致差异。
本系统评价未发现证据支持早期溴隐亭/左旋多巴联合疗法作为预防或延缓PD治疗中运动并发症发生的策略。