Carlos Ruth C, Hussain Hero K, Song Julie H, Francis Isaac R
Department of Radiology, MRI Section, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0300, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jul;179(1):87-92. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.1.1790087.
We assessed the added efficacy of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (gadolinium-EOB) in depicting biliary structures compared with T2-weighted MR cholangiopancreatography (T2-MRCP) and measured reviewer preference and willingness-to-pay for the added value of biliary contrast.
Ten patients prospectively underwent T2-MRCP and gadolinium-EOB-enhanced MR cholangiography (EOB-MRC). Three radiologists reviewed the unpaired, then the paired, examinations, rating biliary visualization using a 5-point scale. The common bile, right and left hepatic ducts, and second-order branches were evaluated. Improved biliary visualization using paired over unpaired tests indicated the added value of contrast media. Kappa values measured interobserver reliability. A regression model controlling for fixed effects due to reviewer and subject correlation quantified improvement in ratings attributable to paired review.
Average visualization ratings for unpaired review of EOB-MRC were the following: common bile duct, 3.3; right hepatic duct, 2.7; left hepatic duct, 2.5; second-order branches, 1.4. Average visualization ratings for unpaired review of T2-MCRP were the following: common bile duct, 3.4; right hepatic duct, 1.8; left hepatic duct, 2.2; second-order branches, 0.9. Ratings improved using paired tests over EOB-MRC and T2-MRCP for all structures (p < 0.001) except for T2-MRCP common bile duct ratings (p > 0.05). Agreement was moderate to good except for EOB-MRC common bile duct ratings. Paired review improved ratings (chi(2) < 0.0001) over T2-MRCP alone by 1.05 and over EOB-MRC alone by 0.68. Despite significant improvement, reviewers preferred unpaired T2-MRCP (53%) over unpaired EOB-MRC (17%) or paired tests (30%). Reviewers were willing to pay $25 (median) for gadolinium-EOB.
Combining T2-MRCP and EOB-MRC significantly improved biliary visualization over each test alone. However, improvement was small, and the perceived added value of gadolinium-EOB was modest.
我们评估了钆-乙氧基苄基-二乙烯三胺五乙酸(钆-EOB)在显示胆管结构方面相对于T2加权磁共振胰胆管造影(T2-MRCP)的额外疗效,并测量了阅片者对胆管造影剂附加值的偏好和支付意愿。
10例患者前瞻性地接受了T2-MRCP和钆-EOB增强磁共振胆管造影(EOB-MRC)检查。三位放射科医生先对未配对的检查进行阅片,然后对配对的检查进行阅片,使用5分制对胆管可视化程度进行评分。评估胆总管、左右肝管及二级分支。配对检查相对于未配对检查胆管可视化程度的改善表明了造影剂的附加值。kappa值用于测量观察者间的可靠性。一个控制阅片者和受试者相关性固定效应的回归模型量化了配对阅片导致的评分改善。
EOB-MRC未配对阅片的平均可视化评分如下:胆总管3.3分;右肝管2.7分;左肝管2.5分;二级分支1.4分。T2-MCRP未配对阅片的平均可视化评分如下:胆总管3.4分;右肝管1.8分;左肝管2.2分;二级分支0.9分。除T2-MRCP胆总管评分外(p>0.05),所有结构的配对检查相对于EOB-MRC和T2-MRCP的评分均有所提高(p<0.001)。除EOB-MRC胆总管评分外,一致性为中度至良好。配对阅片相对于单独的T2-MRCP评分提高了1.05分(chi(2)<0.0001),相对于单独的EOB-MRC评分提高了0.68分。尽管有显著改善,但阅片者更喜欢未配对的T2-MRCP(53%),而不是未配对的EOB-MRC(17%)或配对检查(30%)。阅片者愿意为钆-EOB支付25美元(中位数)。
将T2-MRCP和EOB-MRC联合使用比单独使用每种检查方法能显著改善胆管可视化。然而,改善程度较小,钆-EOB的感知附加值也不高。