Type-specific antibody for hepatitis C virus detected by use of NS-4 peptide and hepatitis C virus genome in Korea.

Hepatitis C virus, often possessing mutant genes, have the features that allow them to avoid host's immunologic response and further cause chronic progressive infections. Therefore, it is essential for those patients infected of HCV to receive improved diagnostic procedures. And it is equally important to investigate the course of disease progression and the response to treatment. The goal of this study is to review the efficacy of the third generation immunoblot assay and standardized RT-PCR-Hybridization assay, and in contrast with genotype identification(genotyping), the followings were briefly evaluated for the efficacy of serotype identification(serotyping) by using NS-4 peptide in the observation of the course and in the treatment of patients with HCV hepatitis. 1. The true positive rate in 132 cases showing repeated positives with 3rd generation anti-HCV EIA are 81.8% by immunoblot assay and 75.8% by RT-PCR-Hybridization assay. 2. The 79.5% concordance of immunoblot and RT-PCR-Hybridization assay is shown. The negative results from immunoblot assay are also negative in RT-PCR-Hybridization assay. 3. Among 95 patients with HCV hepatitis patients in 95 cases, the serotype 1, 2 and 4 were 53.2%, 45.2%, and 1.6%, respectively. In 29 cases, the genotypes of patients with HCV showed 1b in 15 cases, 2a/2c in 8 cases, 2b in 2 cases and mixed type in 4 cases. 4. In comparison between serotype and genotype, they showed 75.9% concordance. But serotyping showed higher efficacy in experimental procedures and sampling conditions, with more convenience. Based on above evaluation and reference review, it is reasonable to check with 3rd generation immunoblot assay the samples producing repeated positive results from anti-HCV EIA. For more definitive diagnosis of HCV infection, it is appropriate to confirm and double-check with standardized RT-PCR-Hybridization assay. Lastly, it is strongly suggested that for observation of progression and for choice of interferon treatment, serotype identification(serotyping) is more useful in practice than genotype identification (genotyping).