Suppr超能文献

临床环境中的决策支持与安全性。

Decision support and safety of clinical environments.

作者信息

Morris A H

机构信息

Pulmonary Division, LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah 84143, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):69-75. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.69.

Abstract

Safety in the clinical environment is based on structures that reduce the probability of harm, on evidence that enhances the likelihood of actions that increase favourable outcomes, and on explicit directions that lead to decisions to implement the actions dictated by this evidence. A clinical decision error rate of only 1% threatens patient safety at a distressing frequency. Explicit computerised decision support tools standardise clinical decision making and lead different clinicians to the same set of diagnostic or therapeutic instructions. They have favourable impacts on patient outcome. Simple computerised algorithms that generate reminders, alerts, or other information, and protocols that incorporate more complex rules reduce the clinical decision error rate. Decision support tools are not new; it is the new attributes of explicit computerised decision support tools that deserve identification. When explicit computerised protocols are driven by patient data, the protocol output (instructions) is patient specific, thus preserving individualized treatment while standardising clinical decisions. The expected decrease in variation and increase in compliance with evidence-based recommendations should decrease the error rate and enhance patient safety.

摘要

临床环境中的安全性基于以下几个方面

能够降低伤害可能性的结构、能提高产生有利结果行动可能性的证据,以及能导致做出实施该证据所规定行动决策的明确指示。仅1%的临床决策错误率就会以令人担忧的频率威胁患者安全。明确的计算机化决策支持工具使临床决策标准化,并引导不同的临床医生遵循同一套诊断或治疗指导。它们对患者预后有积极影响。生成提醒、警报或其他信息的简单计算机算法,以及包含更复杂规则的方案,可降低临床决策错误率。决策支持工具并非新生事物;明确的计算机化决策支持工具的新特性才值得关注。当明确的计算机化方案由患者数据驱动时,方案输出(指导)是针对特定患者的,从而在使临床决策标准化的同时保留个体化治疗。预期的变异性降低以及对循证推荐依从性的提高应会降低错误率并增强患者安全。

相似文献

1
Decision support and safety of clinical environments.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):69-75. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.69.
3
Decision support: a paradigm addition for patient safety.
J Healthc Inf Manag. 2002 Winter;16(1):34-9.
6
Save lives now.
Hosp Health Netw. 2007 Apr;81(4):42-4, 46, 48, 2.
8
Computer protocols: how to implement.
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Mar;23(1):51-67. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.09.002.
9
Mechanical Ventilation and Decision Support in Pediatric Intensive Care.
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;64(5):1057-1070. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

2
3
The Effects of Integrated IT Support on the Prehospital Stroke Process: Results from a Realistic Experiment.
J Healthc Inform Res. 2019 May 23;3(3):300-328. doi: 10.1007/s41666-019-00053-4. eCollection 2019 Sep.
4
Computer-generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;7(7):CD001175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001175.pub4.
5
Development of a decision support system for analysis and solutions of prolonged standing in the workplace.
Saf Health Work. 2014 Jun;5(2):97-105. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 10;2014(6):CD009235. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009235.pub3.
8
Limitations of medical research and evidence at the patient-clinician encounter scale.
Chest. 2013 Apr;143(4):1127-1135. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1908.

本文引用的文献

1
Rational use of computerized protocols in the intensive care unit.
Crit Care. 2001 Oct;5(5):249-54. doi: 10.1186/cc1041. Epub 2001 Sep 13.
2
Patient safety and computerized medication ordering at Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Oct;27(10):509-21. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27045-x.
3
Coprescribing and codispensing of cisapride and contraindicated drugs.
JAMA. 2001 Oct 3;286(13):1607-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1607.
4
A computerized reminder system to increase the use of preventive care for hospitalized patients.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 27;345(13):965-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa010181.
7
Will disruptive innovations cure health care?
Harv Bus Rev. 2000 Sep-Oct;78(5):102-12, 199.
8
Surgical error: ethical issues of adverse events.
Arch Surg. 2000 Nov;135(11):1359-66. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.135.11.1359.
9
The AMA clinical quality improvement forum on addressing patient safety.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Jul;26(7):428-33. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(00)26036-7.
10
Human error: models and management.
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):768-70. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.768.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验