Shan Xiao-Quan, Lian Jun, Wen Bei
Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing.
Chemosphere. 2002 May;47(7):701-10. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00032-2.
Effect of citric, malic, tartaric and acetic acids on adsorption of La, Ce, Pr and Nd by and desorption from four typical Chinese soils was studied. Generally, adsorption capacities of rare earth elements (REEs) were significantly correlated with the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soils. In the presence of acetic acids adsorption of REEs was similar to that in the presence of Ca(NO3)2. However, in the presence of citric, malic and tartaric acids adsorption of REEs by Heilongjiang, Zhejiang and Guangdong soils decreased to varying extents if compared with that in the presence of nitrate and acetic acid. The significance of suppression followed the order of citric acid > malic acid > tartaric acid > acetic acid, which was consistent with the order of stability of complexes of REEs with these organic acids. However, the adsorption increased with increasing equilibrium solution pH. For Jiangxi soil with low soil pH, CEC and organic matter these organic acids exerted an even more serious suppression effect on the adsorption of REEs. Another feature of the relationship between the adsorption of REEs and equilibrium solution pH was that the adsorption of REEs decreased with increase of pH from 2 to 4.5 and then slightly increased with further increase of pH. Desorption of REEs varied with soils and with organic acids as well. REEs were released easily from Heilongjiang, Zhejiang and Guangdong soils in the presence of organic acid. Generally, desorption of REEs decreased with increasing equilibrium solution pH. Effect of organic acids on desorption of REEs from Jiangxi soil was more complicated. In the presence of citric and malic acids no decrement and/or slight increase in desorption of REEs were observed over the equilibrium solution pH from 3 to 6.5. The reasons for this were ascribed to the strong complexing capacity of citric and malic acids and low soil pH, CEC and organic matter of Jiangxi soil.
研究了柠檬酸、苹果酸、酒石酸和乙酸对四种典型中国土壤吸附及解吸镧、铈、镨和钕的影响。一般来说,稀土元素(REEs)的吸附容量与土壤的阳离子交换容量(CEC)显著相关。在乙酸存在下,REEs的吸附与在硝酸钙存在下相似。然而,与在硝酸盐和乙酸存在下相比,在柠檬酸、苹果酸和酒石酸存在下,黑龙江、浙江和广东土壤对REEs的吸附有不同程度的降低。抑制作用的显著程度顺序为柠檬酸>苹果酸>酒石酸>乙酸,这与REEs与这些有机酸形成的配合物的稳定性顺序一致。然而,吸附量随平衡溶液pH值的升高而增加。对于土壤pH值、CEC和有机质较低的江西土壤,这些有机酸对REEs吸附的抑制作用更为严重。REEs吸附与平衡溶液pH值关系的另一个特点是,REEs的吸附量在pH值从2升高到4.5时降低,然后随着pH值的进一步升高而略有增加。REEs的解吸也因土壤和有机酸的不同而有所变化。在有机酸存在下,REEs很容易从黑龙江、浙江和广东土壤中释放出来。一般来说,REEs的解吸量随平衡溶液pH值的升高而降低。有机酸对江西土壤中REEs解吸的影响更为复杂。在柠檬酸和苹果酸存在下,在平衡溶液pH值从3到6.5的范围内,未观察到REEs解吸量的减少和/或略有增加。其原因归因于柠檬酸和苹果酸的强络合能力以及江西土壤的低pH值、CEC和有机质。