Janssen Ulrike, Penke Martina
Institut fuer Sprache und Information, Heinrich-Heine-Universitaet Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Brain Lang. 2002 Apr-Jun;81(1-3):180-91. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2516.
Recent psycholinguistic studies have provided evidence that regularly inflected words are decomposed into stems and affixes, both of which have their own representations in the mental lexicon. Specific models of the lexical organization of inflectional affixes have, however, only rarely been investigated in psycho- or neurolinguistic work. We test two recently proposed theoretical models: a representation of affixes (i) in default inheritance trees (Corbett and Fraser, 1993) and (ii) in underspecified paradigms (Wunderlich, 1996). Based on an analysis of agreement errors in elicited speech-production data of German agrammatic aphasics, we argue that affixes are organized with respect to the morphosyntactic features they encode. Specifically, our data indicate that inflectional affixes are best captured within an underspecified paradigm.
最近的心理语言学研究表明,规则变形的单词会被分解为词干和词缀,二者在心理词库中都有各自的表征。然而,在心理语言学或神经语言学研究中,关于屈折词缀词汇组织的具体模型却很少被研究。我们测试了两个最近提出的理论模型:(i)词缀在默认继承树中的表征(Corbett和Fraser,1993)以及(ii)在未充分指定范式中的表征(Wunderlich,1996)。基于对德国语法缺失性失语症患者诱发言语产生数据中一致错误的分析,我们认为词缀是根据它们所编码的形态句法特征来组织的。具体而言,我们的数据表明,屈折词缀在未充分指定范式中能得到最佳体现。