Baum William M
University of California-Davis, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 May;77(3):347-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-347.
The history of the Harvard Pigeon Lab is a history of two periods of remarkable productivity, the first under Skinner's leadership and the second under Herrnstein's. In each period, graduate students flocked to the leader and then began stimulating one another. Chance favored Herrnstein's leadership, too, because an unusually large number of graduate students were admitted in the fall of 1962. In each period, productivity declined as the leader lost interest in the laboratory and withdrew. Directly and indirectly, the laboratory finally died as a result of the cognitive "revolution." Skinner and his students saw the possibility of a natural science of behavior and set about establishing that science based on concepts such as response rate, stimulus control, and schedules of reinforcement. Herrnstein and his students saw that the science could be quantitative and set about making it so, with relative response rate, the matching law, and the psychophysics of choice (analogous to S. S. Stevens' psychophysics). The history might provide a golden research opportunity for someone interested in the impact of such self-organizing research groups on the progress of science.
哈佛鸽子实验室的历史是两个成果斐然时期的历史,第一个时期在斯金纳的领导下,第二个时期在赫恩斯坦的领导下。在每个时期,研究生们都簇拥在领导者身边,然后开始相互激励。机遇也垂青于赫恩斯坦的领导时期,因为1962年秋季招收了数量异常多的研究生。在每个时期,随着领导者对实验室失去兴趣并抽身离开,生产力都出现了下滑。直接或间接地,该实验室最终因认知“革命”而走向消亡。斯金纳和他的学生们看到了建立行为自然科学的可能性,并着手基于诸如反应速率、刺激控制和强化程序等概念来创建这门科学。赫恩斯坦和他的学生们看到这门科学可以量化,并着手使其量化,提出了相对反应速率、匹配法则以及选择心理物理学(类似于S. S. 史蒂文斯的心理物理学)。这段历史可能会为对这类自组织研究团队对科学进步的影响感兴趣的人提供绝佳的研究机会。