Mori Yoshitaka, Wada Hideo, Gabazza Esteban C, Minami Nobuyuki, Nobori Tsutomu, Shiku Hiroshi, Yagi Hideo, Ishizashi Hiromichi, Matsumoto Masanori, Fujimura Yoshihiro
Mie Red Cross Blood Center, Tsu City, Japan.
Transfusion. 2002 May;42(5):572-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00100.x.
Severe deficiency of vWF-cleaving protease (vWF-CPase) activity was recently found in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Although the survival of patients with TTP has been dramatically improved with plasma exchange (PE), there are still many patients who are refractory to PE and immunosuppressive therapy.
The activities of vWF-CPase and its inhibitor were measured in 27 patients with nonfamilial TTP and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) to examine the relationship between the clinical variables and vWF-CPase activity.
Eight of nine patients with HUS had more than 40 percent of vWF-CPase activity, whereas one had 28 percent of the normal level at the acute phase. Ten of 12 TTP patients with a good outcome had a severe deficiency of vWF-CPase activity and its inhibitor, whereas four of six patients with a poor outcome had a moderate deficiency of vWF-CPase activity along with a lack of the inhibitor. PE produced normalization of the vWF-CPase activity and neutralization of the inhibitor in TTP patients with a good outcome; however, some TTP patients with vWF-CPase inhibitor had relapsed and required an immunosuppressive therapy. The response to the combination therapy with PE and immunosuppressive treatment was poor in TTP patients without a severe deficiency of vWF-CPase activity.
Assays of vWF-CPase activity and its inhibitor may be useful for predicting the response to therapy and the outcome of patients with TTP. In some patients, nonfamilial TTP with a poor prognosis may not be caused by a constitutional or acquired deficiency of vWF-CPase with its inhibitor. Although PE and immunosuppressive therapy are effective in patients with nonfamilial TTP and a vWF-CPase inhibitor, other therapeutic modalities may be needed for nonfamilial TTP with unknown etiology.
近期在血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)患者中发现血管性血友病因子裂解蛋白酶(vWF-CPase)活性严重缺乏。尽管血浆置换(PE)显著提高了TTP患者的生存率,但仍有许多患者对PE和免疫抑制治疗无效。
检测了27例非家族性TTP和溶血尿毒综合征(HUS)患者的vWF-CPase及其抑制剂活性,以研究临床变量与vWF-CPase活性之间的关系。
9例HUS患者中有8例vWF-CPase活性超过正常水平的40%,而1例在急性期vWF-CPase活性为正常水平的28%。12例预后良好的TTP患者中有10例vWF-CPase活性及其抑制剂严重缺乏,而6例预后不良的患者中有4例vWF-CPase活性中度缺乏且缺乏抑制剂。PE使预后良好的TTP患者的vWF-CPase活性恢复正常并中和了抑制剂;然而,一些有vWF-CPase抑制剂的TTP患者复发,需要进行免疫抑制治疗。vWF-CPase活性无严重缺乏的TTP患者对PE和免疫抑制联合治疗反应不佳。
检测vWF-CPase活性及其抑制剂可能有助于预测TTP患者的治疗反应和预后。在一些患者中,预后不良的非家族性TTP可能不是由vWF-CPase及其抑制剂的先天性或后天性缺乏引起的。尽管PE和免疫抑制治疗对非家族性TTP和有vWF-CPase抑制剂的患者有效,但对于病因不明的非家族性TTP可能需要其他治疗方式。