Baseman A G, Lemack G E
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9110, USA.
Curr Urol Rep. 2001 Oct;2(5):407-12. doi: 10.1007/s11934-996-0028-7.
Standard treatment for urinary incontinence in women has evolved during the past few decades. Conservative measures such as pelvic floor exercises and biofeedback may be effective and have been advocated for the past several years. However, the availability of other methods that are potentially more invasive yet efficacious provides a wider range of choices for women with urinary incontinence. With these alternatives comes opportunity and responsibility to assess how successful these treatments are. This article explores current methods of analyzing outcomes of urinary incontinence treatments.
在过去几十年中,女性尿失禁的标准治疗方法不断演变。诸如盆底肌锻炼和生物反馈等保守措施可能有效,并且在过去几年中一直被提倡。然而,其他一些可能更具侵入性但有效的方法的出现,为患有尿失禁的女性提供了更多选择。有了这些替代方法,就有机会也有责任去评估这些治疗的成功程度。本文探讨了目前分析尿失禁治疗结果的方法。