Parker Robin L, Huntsman David G, Lesack David W, Cupples James B, Grant Dennis R, Akbari Majid, Gilks C Blake
Department of Pathology, Vancouver Hospital and University of British Columbia, Canada.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2002 May;117(5):723-8. doi: 10.1309/PEF8-GL6F-YWMC-AG56.
The determination of tumor cell estrogen receptor (ER) expression status by immunohistochemical analysis has become standard practice, yet assay reproducibility has not been assessed adequately. By using a breast cancer tissue microarray, we examined interlaboratory variability in ER reporting. A 2-fold redundant tissue microarray block was created from 29 breast cancers. Unstained slides were distributed to 5 laboratories, and each laboratory immunostained and scored 1 slide for ER. Interlaboratory agreement ranged from moderate to high (overall kappa = 0.54 for 0-3+ grading; overall kappa = 0.84 for negative vs positive assessment of ER status). When 1 observer scored each of the 5 slides, interlaboratory agreement was slightly better (kappa = 0.63 for 0-3+ scoring; kappa = 0.96 for negative vs positive scoring). One laboratory, which had used an antibody and antigen retrieval method different from the others, demonstrated only fair concordance with the other 4 laboratories, but there was substantial intralaboratory interobserver agreement and excellent agreement with an outside observer reviewing the slide stained in that laboratory. The tissue microarray was an efficient and effective tool for identifying variability in ER reporting and should prove valuable in other external quality assurance programs.
通过免疫组织化学分析确定肿瘤细胞雌激素受体(ER)表达状态已成为标准做法,但检测的可重复性尚未得到充分评估。我们使用乳腺癌组织微阵列,研究了ER报告中的实验室间差异。从29例乳腺癌中制作了一个2倍冗余的组织微阵列块。将未染色的玻片分发给5个实验室,每个实验室对1张玻片进行ER免疫染色和评分。实验室间的一致性从中度到高度不等(0-3+分级的总体kappa值为0.54;ER状态阴性与阳性评估的总体kappa值为0.84)。当一名观察者对5张玻片中的每张进行评分时,实验室间的一致性略好(0-3+评分的kappa值为0.63;阴性与阳性评分的kappa值为0.96)。有一个实验室使用了与其他实验室不同的抗体和抗原修复方法,与其他4个实验室的一致性仅为一般,但该实验室内部观察者间有实质性的一致性,且与审查该实验室染色玻片的外部观察者有极好的一致性。组织微阵列是识别ER报告差异的一种有效工具,在其他外部质量保证项目中应会证明很有价值。