Meyerson Lori A, Long Patricia J, Miranda Robert, Marx Brian P
Department of Psychology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 2002 Apr;26(4):387-405. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00315-0.
The primary aim of the current study was to examine the contributions of sexual abuse, physical abuse, family cohesion, and conflict in predicting the psychological functioning of adolescents. Additional analyses were conducted to determine whether adolescent victims of child sexual abuse and physical abuse perceive their family environments as more conflictual and less cohesive than nonabused adolescents.
Participants were 131 male and female adolescents, ages 16 years to 18 years, receiving services at a residential vocational training program. Participants completed well established psychological assessment tools to assess abuse history, family environment characteristics, and current adjustment.
Physically abused adolescent females perceived their family environments as more conflictual and less cohesive than females without physical abuse, and sexually abused females perceived their family environments as more conflictual and less cohesive than females without sexual abuse. Physically abused adolescent males reported more conflict than males without physical abuse, but did not differ with regard to cohesion. Adolescent males with and without a sexual abuse history did not differ on the family dimensions. Multiple regression analyses revealed that both conflict and cohesion, in addition to a history of sexual and physical abuse, predicted depression and distress. Separate analyses by gender revealed these variables differentially impact adjustment in male and female adolescents. Results of a power analysis indicated sufficient power to detect these differences.
Findings indicate that in addition to child sexual abuse and physical abuse, family conflict and cohesion are risk factors for the development of psychological distress and depression in adolescence. Implications for treatment and directions for future research are discussed.
本研究的主要目的是检验性虐待、身体虐待、家庭凝聚力和冲突对预测青少年心理功能的作用。还进行了额外分析,以确定遭受儿童性虐待和身体虐待的青少年是否比未受虐待的青少年认为他们的家庭环境更具冲突性且凝聚力更低。
参与者为131名年龄在16岁至18岁之间的青少年男女,他们在一个寄宿职业培训项目中接受服务。参与者完成了成熟的心理评估工具,以评估虐待史、家庭环境特征和当前的适应情况。
遭受身体虐待的青少年女性比未遭受身体虐待的女性认为她们的家庭环境更具冲突性且凝聚力更低,遭受性虐待的女性比未遭受性虐待的女性认为她们的家庭环境更具冲突性且凝聚力更低。遭受身体虐待的青少年男性报告的冲突比未遭受身体虐待的男性更多,但在凝聚力方面没有差异。有和没有性虐待史的青少年男性在家庭维度上没有差异。多元回归分析显示,除了性虐待和身体虐待史外,冲突和凝聚力都能预测抑郁和困扰。按性别进行的单独分析表明,这些变量对男性和女性青少年的适应有不同影响。功效分析结果表明有足够的功效来检测这些差异。
研究结果表明,除了儿童性虐待和身体虐待外,家庭冲突和凝聚力是青少年心理困扰和抑郁发展的风险因素。讨论了对治疗的启示和未来研究的方向。