Sivinski Connie L, Kohlgraf Karl G, VanLith Michelle L, Morikane Keita, Tempero Richard M, Hollingsworth Michael A
Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases and Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6805, USA.
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002 Aug;51(6):327-40. doi: 10.1007/s00262-002-0277-3. Epub 2002 May 4.
Previous studies have indicated that different effector cells are required to eliminate MUC1-expressing tumors derived from different organ sites and that different vaccine strategies may be necessary to generate these two different MUC1-specific immune responses. In this study, we characterized molecular components that are required to produce immune responses that eliminate Panc02.MUC1 tumors in vivo by utilizing mice genetically deficient in molecules related to immunity. A parallel study has been reported for a B16.MUC1 tumor model. We confirmed that a CD8(+) effector cell was required to eliminate MUC1-expressing Panc02 tumors, and demonstrated that T cells expressing TCR-alpha/beta and co-stimulation through CD28 and CD40:CD40L interactions played critical roles during the initiation of the anti-Panc02.MUC1 immune response. TCR-alpha/beta(+) cells were required to eliminate Panc02.MUC1 tumors, while TCR-gamma/delta(+) cells played a suppressive non-MUC1-specific role in anti-Panc02 tumor immunity. Type 1 cytokine interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), but not interleukin-12 (IL-12), was essential for eliminating MUC1-expressing tumors, while neither IL-4 nor IL-10 (type 2 cytokines) were required for tumor rejection. In vitro studies demonstrated that IFN-gamma upregulated MHC class I, but not MHC class II, on Panc02.MUC1 tumor cells. Surprisingly, both perforin and FasL played unique roles during the effector phase of immunity to Panc02.MUC1, while lymphotoxin-alpha, but not TNFR-1, was required for immunity against Panc02.MUC1 tumors. The findings presented here and in parallel studies of B16.MUC1 immunity clearly demonstrate that different effector cells and cytolytic mechanisms are required to eliminate MUC1-expressing tumors derived from different organ sites, and provide insight into the immune components required to eliminate tumors expressing the same antigen but derived from different tissues.
先前的研究表明,消除源自不同器官部位的表达MUC1的肿瘤需要不同的效应细胞,并且可能需要不同的疫苗策略来产生这两种不同的MUC1特异性免疫反应。在本研究中,我们利用与免疫相关分子基因缺陷的小鼠,对在体内产生消除Panc02.MUC1肿瘤的免疫反应所需的分子成分进行了表征。对于B16.MUC1肿瘤模型已有一项平行研究报道。我们证实,消除表达MUC1的Panc02肿瘤需要CD8(+)效应细胞,并证明表达TCR-α/β且通过CD28和CD40:CD40L相互作用进行共刺激的T细胞在抗Panc02.MUC1免疫反应的启动过程中起关键作用。消除Panc02.MUC1肿瘤需要TCR-α/β(+)细胞,而TCR-γ/δ(+)细胞在抗Panc02肿瘤免疫中起抑制性的非MUC1特异性作用。1型细胞因子干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)而非白细胞介素-12(IL-12)对于消除表达MUC1的肿瘤至关重要,而肿瘤排斥既不需要IL-4也不需要IL-10(2型细胞因子)。体外研究表明,IFN-γ上调了Panc02.MUC1肿瘤细胞上的MHC I类分子,但未上调MHC II类分子。令人惊讶的是,穿孔素和FasL在针对Panc02.MUC-1免疫的效应阶段均发挥独特作用,而针对Panc02.MUC1肿瘤的免疫需要淋巴毒素-α而非TNFR-1。此处呈现的研究结果以及对B16.MUC1免疫的平行研究清楚地表明,消除源自不同器官部位的表达MUC1的肿瘤需要不同的效应细胞和溶细胞机制,并为消除表达相同抗原但源自不同组织的肿瘤所需的免疫成分提供了深入了解。