Roussis Stilianos G, Fedora James W
Research Department, Products and Chemicals Division, Imperial Oil, Sarnia, Ontario, Canada, N7T 8C8.
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2002;16(13):1295-303. doi: 10.1002/rcm.714.
The capabilities of atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) and electrospray ionization (ESI) methods for quantitative analysis of polar and ionic compounds in petroleum fractions have been examined. The requirements of the analysis for sensitivity, linear dynamic range, and structural characterization have been discussed. ESI was found to be approximately two orders of magnitude more sensitive than APCI and is most suitable for the detection of analytes in weak concentrations. Equivalent relative linear dynamic ranges were observed by the two methods (at least three orders of magnitude). For the relatively high analyte concentrations examined here (e.g., 1-100 ppm or higher), the absolute area counts increased linearly with the analyte amount only in APCI, making this method more attractive for quantitative liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) applications. Nevertheless, a wider range of ionic compounds can be detected by ESI than by APCI.
考察了大气压化学电离(APCI)和电喷雾电离(ESI)方法对石油馏分中极性和离子化合物进行定量分析的能力。讨论了分析对灵敏度、线性动态范围和结构表征的要求。发现ESI的灵敏度比APCI高约两个数量级,最适合检测低浓度的分析物。两种方法观察到等效的相对线性动态范围(至少三个数量级)。对于此处考察的相对较高的分析物浓度(例如1-100 ppm或更高),仅在APCI中绝对面积计数随分析物量呈线性增加,使得该方法在定量液相色谱/质谱(LC/MS)应用中更具吸引力。然而,ESI能检测的离子化合物范围比APCI更广。