Suppr超能文献

直接套管针技术:一种腹腔镜检查腹部入路的替代方法。

The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy.

作者信息

Jacobson Mary T, Osias Joelle, Bizhang Ramin, Tsang Mathew, Lata Sneh, Helmy Medad, Nezhat Ceana, Nezhat Camran

机构信息

Department of Ob/Gyn, Stanford University School of Medicine, California, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2002 Apr-Jun;6(2):169-74.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The direct trocar technique is an alternative to Veress needle insertion and open laparoscopy for accessing the abdominal cavity for operative laparoscopy. We review our approach to abdominal entry in 1385 laparoscopies performed between September 1993 and June 2000 by our group at Stanford University Hospital, a tertiary Medical Center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of 1385 patients who underwent operative laparoscopy during the study years. The mode of abdominal entry, patient demographics, and complications were reviewed.

RESULTS

The transumbilical direct trocar entry method was used in 1223 patients. In 133 patients, the Veress needle insertion technique was used. Open laparoscopy was used in 22 patients. Three (0.21%) major complicadons occurred: 1 enterotomy, 1 omental herniation, and 1 bowel hemiation. One complication was related to primary access (0.072%) in a patient who had an open laparoscopy. She sustained an enterotomy during placement of the primary trocar. The bowel was repaired laparoscopically. No trocar-related injuries occurred among the 1223 patients in whom the direct trocar entry technique was used. One patient had an omental herniation and required a repeat laparoscopy on postoperative day 2. The second patient had a repeat laparoscopy on the 12th postoperative day to repair a bowel herniation. None of our patients required a laparotomy. No vascular injuries occurred.

CONCLUSION

Based on our experience, the direct trocar technique is a safe approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

目的

对于手术腹腔镜检查时进入腹腔,直接套管针技术是替代Veress针穿刺和开放腹腔镜检查的一种方法。我们回顾了1993年9月至2000年6月间我们在斯坦福大学医院(一家三级医疗中心)的团队所进行的1385例腹腔镜检查中进入腹腔的方法。

方法

我们对研究期间接受手术腹腔镜检查的1385例患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。回顾了腹腔进入方式、患者人口统计学资料及并发症情况。

结果

1223例患者采用经脐直接套管针进入法。133例患者采用Veress针穿刺技术。22例患者采用开放腹腔镜检查。发生了3例(0.21%)严重并发症:1例肠切开、1例网膜疝和1例肠疝。1例并发症与开放腹腔镜检查患者的初次入路有关(0.072%)。她在放置初次套管针时发生肠切开。通过腹腔镜修复了肠管。在采用直接套管针进入技术的1223例患者中未发生与套管针相关的损伤。1例患者发生网膜疝,术后第2天需要再次进行腹腔镜检查。第2例患者术后第12天因肠疝进行了再次腹腔镜检查。我们的患者均无需开腹手术。未发生血管损伤。

结论

根据我们的经验,直接套管针技术是腹腔镜手术进入腹腔的一种安全方法。

相似文献

3
Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007 May;29(5):433-447. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35496-2.
4
Laparoscopic entry techniques.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 31;8:CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub4.
6
Laparoscopic entry techniques.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 18;1(1):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5.
7
Use of the optical access trocar for safe and rapid entry in various laparoscopic procedures.
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):570-3. doi: 10.1007/s004640080056. Epub 2001 Apr 3.
9
Safety of Veress needle for laparoscopic entry in children: Myth or reality?
J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Mar;56(3):569-572. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
10
Laparoscopic entry techniques.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD006583. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of bilateral uterine artery ligation on blood loss during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 2;12:1577904. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1577904. eCollection 2025.
4
Operative Gynecological Laparoscopy Under Conscious Sedation.
JSLS. 2020 Apr-Jun;24(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00020.
6
Laparoscopic Salpingo-oophorectomy in Conscious Sedation.
JSLS. 2015 Jul-Sep;19(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00031.
8
Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2686-97. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9871-6. Epub 2008 Apr 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery.
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Jun;192(6):677-83. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)00913-9.
2
Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 May;104(5):595-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11539.x.
3
A nationwide analysis of laparoscopic complications.
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;89(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(96)00390-0.
6
The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal.
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Feb;85(2):269-72. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00352-E.
7
A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Jul 15;110(6):886-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(71)90593-x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验