Park Kwideok, Park Joon
330ET, Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA.
J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(3):363-72. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10234.
Previous studies associated with the development of a new ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) acetabular component have shown high interfacial tensile strengths through chemical and mechanical bonds between virgin UHMWPE or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and PMMA/methylmethacrylate (MMA) monomer treated UHMWPE. Along with the interfacial strength, the mechanism of interfacial strength development has been investigated, correlating the interfacial strength to its structure, with the different molding temperatures or amount of PMMA in the treated UHMWPE. Of three different fracture patterns-adhesive, mixed, and cohesive-most fractures occurred in the mixed or cohesive mode, indicating either a strong interface or a weak bulk phase. Load-displacement plots from the interfacial tensile tests represented two distinct fracture patterns, suggesting the nature of interfacial structure. Comparison of theoretical and real interfacial strength showed a close match between the two strengths for the interface between PMMA and treated UHMWPE, but a large difference for the interface between UHMWPE and treated UHMWPE. This result hints that although the PMMA/treated UHMWPE interface develops its interfacial strength in a relatively simple mechanism of direct chemical bonds, the UHMWPE/treated-UHMWPE interface builds its strength in a complex way.
先前与新型超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)髋臼部件研发相关的研究表明,通过原始UHMWPE或聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)与经PMMA/甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)单体处理的UHMWPE之间的化学和机械键合,可实现较高的界面拉伸强度。除了界面强度,还对界面强度发展的机制进行了研究,将界面强度与其结构相关联,涉及处理过的UHMWPE中不同的成型温度或PMMA含量。在三种不同的断裂模式(粘结、混合和内聚)中,大多数断裂以混合或内聚模式发生,这表明要么界面很强,要么本体相很弱。界面拉伸试验的载荷-位移曲线呈现出两种不同的断裂模式,这表明了界面结构的性质。理论界面强度与实际界面强度的比较表明,PMMA与处理过的UHMWPE之间的界面,两者强度匹配紧密,但UHMWPE与处理过的UHMWPE之间的界面,两者强度差异很大。这一结果表明,虽然PMMA/处理过的UHMWPE界面通过相对简单的直接化学键合机制形成其界面强度,但UHMWPE/处理过的UHMWPE界面以复杂的方式形成其强度。