二、“要求进行”剖宫产的不实情况。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

II. The unfacts of 'request' caesarean section.

作者信息

Bewley Susan, Cockburn Jayne

机构信息

Women's Health Services, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):597-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.07106.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.07106.x

PMID:12118634

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

II. The unfacts of 'request' caesarean section.

BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):597-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.07106.x.

The unfacts of "request" caesarean section.

BJOG. 2003 Aug;110(8):784; author reply 784-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02029.x.

I. The unethics of 'request' caesarean section.

BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):593-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01706.x.

Elective caesarean sections--risks to the infant.

Lancet. 2009 Aug 29;374(9691):675-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61544-0.

The case against elective cesarean section.

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Dec;15(3):23-38; quiz 89. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200112000-00004.

Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries.

BJOG. 2004 Jul;111(7):754-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00155.x.

Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function?

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1303-8. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

Reply to: Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody?

J Perinat Med. 2005;33(2):112. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2005.020.

Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):601-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57.

Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function?

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):253-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1304-7. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.

Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0.

An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005509.

Preference for institutional delivery and caesarean sections in Bangladesh.

J Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Mar;31(1):96-109. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i1.14754.

Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004660.pub3.

Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 2;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-78.

Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Oct 30;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-50.

The economic case for planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term.

CMAJ. 2006 Apr 11;174(8):1118-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060171.

Rise in "no indicated risk" primary caesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: cross sectional analysis.

BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):71-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38279.705336.0B. Epub 2004 Nov 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

II. The unfacts of 'request' caesarean section.

BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):597-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.07106.x.

The unfacts of "request" caesarean section.

BJOG. 2003 Aug;110(8):784; author reply 784-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2003.02029.x.

I. The unethics of 'request' caesarean section.

BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):593-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01706.x.

Elective caesarean sections--risks to the infant.

Lancet. 2009 Aug 29;374(9691):675-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61544-0.

The case against elective cesarean section.

J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2001 Dec;15(3):23-38; quiz 89. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200112000-00004.

Caesarean section is protective against stress urinary incontinence: an analysis of women with multiple deliveries.

BJOG. 2004 Jul;111(7):754-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00155.x.

Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function?

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1303-8. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

Reply to: Cesarean section upon request: is it appropriate for everybody?

J Perinat Med. 2005;33(2):112. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2005.020.

Patient choice cesarean: an evidence-based review.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 Aug;59(8):601-16. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57.

Should women be offered elective cesarean section in the hope of preserving pelvic floor function?

Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2005 Jul-Aug;16(4):253-4. doi: 10.1007/s00192-005-1304-7. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

Why the Elective Caesarean Lottery is Ethically Impermissible.

Health Care Anal. 2019 Dec;27(4):249-268. doi: 10.1007/s10728-019-00370-0.

An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing: A population-based retrospective cohort study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Feb;96(7):e5509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005509.

Preference for institutional delivery and caesarean sections in Bangladesh.

J Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Mar;31(1):96-109. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v31i1.14754.

Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Mar 14;2012(3):CD004660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004660.pub3.

Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 2;10:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-78.

Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 Oct 30;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-50.

The economic case for planned cesarean section for breech presentation at term.

CMAJ. 2006 Apr 11;174(8):1118-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.060171.

Rise in "no indicated risk" primary caesareans in the United States, 1991-2001: cross sectional analysis.

BMJ. 2005 Jan 8;330(7482):71-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38279.705336.0B. Epub 2004 Nov 19.