Gerard Michael J, Armstrong Thomas J, Martin Bernard J, Rampel David A
Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York 14650-3002, USA.
Hum Factors. 2002 Spring;44(1):51-61. doi: 10.1518/0018720024494757.
A laboratory study was conducted to determine the effects of work pace on typing force, electromyographic (EMG) activity, and subjective discomfort. We found that as participants typed faster, their typing force and finger flexor and extensor EMG activity increased linearly. There was also an increase in subjective discomfort, with a sharp threshold between participants' self-selected pace and their maximum typing speed. The results suggest that participants self-select a typing pace that maximizes typing speed and minimizes discomfort. The fastest typists did not produce significantly more finger flexor EMG activity but did produce proportionately less finger extensor EMG activity compared with the slower typists. We hypothesize that fast typists may use different muscle recruitment patterns that allow them to be more efficient than slower typists at striking the keys. In addition, faster typists do not experience more discomfort than slow typists. These findings show that the relative pace of typing is more important than actual typing speed with regard to discomfort and muscle activity. These results suggest that typists may benefit from skill training to increase maximum typing speed. Potential applications of this research includes skill training for typist.
进行了一项实验室研究,以确定工作节奏对打字力度、肌电图(EMG)活动和主观不适感的影响。我们发现,随着参与者打字速度加快,他们的打字力度以及手指屈肌和伸肌的肌电图活动呈线性增加。主观不适感也有所增加,在参与者自我选择的节奏与其最大打字速度之间存在一个明显的阈值。结果表明,参与者会自我选择一种打字节奏,以实现打字速度最大化并将不适感降至最低。与打字较慢的人相比,打字最快的人手指屈肌的肌电图活动增加并不显著,但手指伸肌的肌电图活动相应减少。我们推测,打字快的人可能采用了不同的肌肉募集模式,这使他们在按键时比打字慢的人更高效。此外,打字快的人并不比打字慢的人感到更多不适。这些发现表明,就不适感和肌肉活动而言,打字的相对节奏比实际打字速度更重要。这些结果表明,打字员可能会从技能训练中受益,以提高最大打字速度。这项研究的潜在应用包括打字员的技能训练。