Ntoumenopoulos G, Presneill J J, McElholum M, Cade J F
Physiotherapy Department, The Alfred, Commercial Rd. Prahran 3181, Australia.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Jul;28(7):850-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1342-2. Epub 2002 May 24.
Pneumonia is an important complication in patients who are intubated and mechanically ventilated, when it is commonly referred to as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Since VAP may be contributed to by impaired sputum clearance, we studied whether chest physiotherapy designed to enhance sputum clearance decreases the occurrence of VAP.
Prospective controlled systematic allocation trial.
Tertiary teaching hospital ICU.
Sixty adult patients intubated and mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h.
Chest physiotherapy (intervention group) or sham physiotherapy (control group).
Control and intervention groups were well matched for age, sex, and admission PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio, APACHE II score, and Glasgow Coma Score. There were no differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in ICU or mortality. VAP was assessed daily by combined clinical assessment and the clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS). VAP occurred in 39% (14/36) of the control group and 8% (2/24) of the intervention group (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.56, P = 0.02). After adjustment was made by logistic regression for other important variables (APACHE II score, duration of mechanical ventilation, presence of tracheostomy, and GCS score), chest physiotherapy was independently associated with a reduced occurrence of VAP (adjusted OR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.94, P = 0.02).
In this small trial, chest physiotherapy in ventilated patients was independently associated with a reduction in VAP. This suggested benefit of physiotherapy in prevention of VAP requires confirmation with a larger randomised controlled trial.
肺炎是气管插管和机械通气患者的一种重要并发症,此时通常称为呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)。由于痰液清除功能受损可能导致VAP,我们研究了旨在增强痰液清除的胸部物理治疗是否能降低VAP的发生率。
前瞻性对照系统分配试验。
三级教学医院重症监护病房。
60例成年患者,气管插管并机械通气至少48小时。
胸部物理治疗(干预组)或假物理治疗(对照组)。
对照组和干预组在年龄、性别、入院时的PaO₂/FiO₂比值、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分和格拉斯哥昏迷评分方面匹配良好。机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间或死亡率无差异。通过临床综合评估和临床肺部感染评分(CPIS)每日评估VAP。对照组VAP发生率为39%(14/36),干预组为8%(2/24)(比值比=0.14,95%可信区间0.03至0.56,P=0.02)。在通过逻辑回归对其他重要变量(APACHE II评分、机械通气时间、气管切开术的存在和格拉斯哥昏迷评分)进行调整后,胸部物理治疗与VAP发生率降低独立相关(调整后的比值比=0.16,95%可信区间0.03至0.94,P=0.02)。
在这项小型试验中,通气患者的胸部物理治疗与VAP减少独立相关。物理治疗在预防VAP方面的这一潜在益处需要通过更大规模的随机对照试验来证实。