Chan Sorway W, Hensman Chris, Waxman Bruce P, Blamey Stephen, Cox John, Farrell Ken, Fox Jane, Gribbin John, Layani Laront
Department of Surgery and Monash Medical Centre, Victoria, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Jul;72(7):523-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02461.x.
To document the technical aspects, outcome and lessons learnt during the learning curve phase of implementing laparoscopic splenectomy, by comparing the results before and after the introduction of a standardized technique.
We present a retrospective and prospective review of laparoscopic splenectomies over a 4-year period. Two chronological periods were studied, before and after the implementation of a standardized technique of a laparoscopic splenectomy involving: (i) hilar dissection with ultrasonic shears; (ii) two experienced laparoscopic surgeons; and (iii) trained dedicated equipment and staff using a checklist approach in the preparation and conduct of the operation. Two groups of patients were studied relating to the periods before and after the implementation of a standardized technique. Statistical methods used were the Wilcoxon's rank sum test and the two-sample test.
Thirty-one laparoscopic splenectomies were attempted. The most common indication was for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. When comparing the early phase (n = 15) with the standardized technique phase (n = 16), there was a significant reduction in conversion rates (40% vs 6%), operating times (218 min vs 171 min), complication rates (6 cases including 1 death vs none) and length of stay (11 days vs 4 days). The results were significant for reduction in hospital stay, conversion rates and complications rates.
A reduction in conversion rates, operating time, morbidity and length of stay was realized during the learning curve of implementing laparoscopic splenectomy by adopting a standardized technique. This technique involved hilar dissection using the ultrasonic shears, two experienced laparoscopic surgeons performing the surgery, dedicated equipment and trained staff using the checklist approach. We recommend such a standardized technique in performing laparoscopic splenectomy.
通过比较标准化技术引入前后的结果,记录实施腹腔镜脾切除术学习曲线阶段的技术要点、结果及经验教训。
我们对4年期间的腹腔镜脾切除术进行了回顾性和前瞻性研究。研究了两个按时间顺序排列的阶段,即实施腹腔镜脾切除术标准化技术之前和之后,该标准化技术包括:(i)使用超声刀进行肝门解剖;(ii)两名经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生;(iii)训练有素的专门设备和工作人员在手术准备和实施过程中采用核对清单方法。研究了与标准化技术实施前后两个时期相关的两组患者。使用的统计方法是Wilcoxon秩和检验和两样本检验。
共尝试进行31例腹腔镜脾切除术。最常见的适应症是特发性血小板减少性紫癜。将早期阶段(n = 15)与标准化技术阶段(n = 16)进行比较时,转化率(40%对6%)、手术时间(218分钟对171分钟)、并发症发生率(6例包括1例死亡对无)和住院时间(11天对4天)均显著降低。住院时间、转化率和并发症发生率的降低结果具有显著性。
在实施腹腔镜脾切除术的学习曲线期间,通过采用标准化技术,转化率、手术时间、发病率和住院时间均有所降低。该技术包括使用超声刀进行肝门解剖、两名经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行手术、专门设备以及采用核对清单方法的训练有素的工作人员。我们建议在进行腹腔镜脾切除术时采用这种标准化技术。