Herbst Roy S, Khuri Fadlo R, Lu Charles, Liu Diane D, Fossella Frank V, Glisson Bonnie S, Pisters Katherine M W, Shin Dong M, Papadimitrakopoulou Vassiliki A, Kurie Jonathan M, Blumenschein George, Kies Merrill S, Zinner Ralph, Jung Maria S, Lu Robert, Lee J Jack, Munden Reginald F, Hong Waun Ki, Lee Jin Soo
Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030-4009, USA.
Cancer. 2002 Jul 15;95(2):340-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10629.
Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are two of the most active third-generation agents for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The authors conducted a formal Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both untreated and previously treated patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC.
A total of 78 patients were treated on the current Phase II trial of front-line or second/third-line therapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC. Eligible patients manifested either untreated disease (n = 42) or had received at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (n = 36). The median age was 57.5 years (range, 33-79) with 57 men (73%) and 21 women (27%). The median performance status was one (range, one to two). The initial eight patients (four untreated and four previously treated) were treated at a previously established maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15, with significant myelosuppression seen in five out of eight patients requiring dose omission in the first cycle. The next 70 patients received a reduced dose of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15.
Seventy eight patients were treated. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 evaluable patients who received front-line therapy had objective responses and 14 (33%) had stable disease. In the patients with prior treatment, 6 (17%) of 36 patients had partial response and 18 patients (50%) had stable disease. Median survival time for the previously untreated patient group was 10.1 months, with a one year survival of 43% and a two year survival rate of 32%. For the previously treated patients, the median survival time was 8.5 months, with a one year survival rate of 30%. Toxic effects were notable for significant myelosuppression, with > or =Grade 3 granulocytopenia seen in 55% of the patients on the untreated arm and 67% of the patients on the previously treated arm. Additionally, 9.5% and 13.9% (untreated and previously treated), respectively, of these patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at some point in their treatment. A full dose delivery analysis showed that this myelosuppression resulted in Course 1, Day 15 skipped doses (even at the reduced dose level) in 42% of previously untreated patients and 47% of pretreated patients. Other side effects seen at Grades 3 and 4 in previously untreated and treated patients included anemia (9.5% and 2.8%), asthenia (4.8% and 5.5%), infection (14.3% and 5.6%), pain (9.5% and 19.4%), and pulmonary complications (4.8% and 13.8%).
Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is an active, well-tolerated combination in both front-line and second/third-line therapy for Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The response rate, median survival rate, and one year survival rate compare favorably with platinum-based regimens. The toxicity profile of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination was quite favorable, with minimal Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects aside from granulocytopenia, which resulted in numerous Day 15 skipped doses but no significant febrile neutropenia or infection. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine could be a useful regimen in standard clinical practice and has the potential for efficient combination with biologic/targeted therapy. Multiple randomized trials of this combination versus platinum combinations are now ongoing [corrected].
吉西他滨和长春瑞滨是治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)最有效的两种第三代药物。作者进行了一项正式的II期试验,以评估该联合方案在未经治疗和既往接受过治疗的IIIB期(伴有胸腔积液)或IV期NSCLC患者中的疗效。
共有78例患者在当前的NSCLC吉西他滨和长春瑞滨一线或二线/三线治疗II期试验中接受治疗。符合条件的患者表现为未经治疗的疾病(n = 42)或接受过至少一种但不超过两种先前化疗方案(n = 36)。中位年龄为57.5岁(范围33 - 79岁),其中男性57例(73%),女性21例(27%)。中位体能状态为1(范围1 - 2)。最初的8例患者(4例未经治疗和4例先前接受过治疗)在第1、8和15天接受先前确定的长春瑞滨最大耐受剂量(30 mg/m²)和吉西他滨(1000 mg/m²)治疗,8例患者中有5例出现明显的骨髓抑制,需要在第一个周期中减少剂量。接下来的70例患者在第1、8和15天接受减少剂量的长春瑞滨(25 mg/m²),随后是吉西他滨(900 mg/m²)。
78例患者接受了治疗。42例接受一线治疗的可评估患者中有15例(36%)获得客观缓解,14例(33%)病情稳定。在先前接受过治疗的患者中,36例患者中有6例(17%)部分缓解,18例患者(50%)病情稳定。先前未接受治疗的患者组中位生存时间为10.1个月,一年生存率为43%,两年生存率为32%。对于先前接受过治疗的患者,中位生存时间为8.5个月,一年生存率为30%。毒性作用主要表现为明显的骨髓抑制,未经治疗组55%的患者和先前接受过治疗组67%的患者出现≥3级粒细胞减少。此外,这些患者中分别有9.5%和13.9%(未经治疗和先前接受过治疗)在治疗的某个阶段出现3级和4级血小板减少。全剂量给药分析表明,这种骨髓抑制导致42%的先前未接受治疗的患者和47%的先前接受过治疗的患者在第1疗程第15天跳过剂量(即使在减少剂量水平)。在先前未接受治疗和接受过治疗的患者中,3级和4级出现的其他副作用包括贫血(9.5%和2.8%)、乏力(4.8%和5.5%)、感染(14.3%和5.6%)、疼痛(9.5%和19.4%)以及肺部并发症(4.8%和13.8%)。
吉西他滨/长春瑞滨在IIIB/IV期NSCLC的一线和二线/三线治疗中是一种有效的、耐受性良好的联合方案。缓解率、中位生存率和一年生存率与基于铂类的方案相比具有优势。吉西他滨/长春瑞滨联合方案的毒性特征相当良好,除粒细胞减少外,3级和4级毒性作用最小,粒细胞减少导致大量第15天跳过剂量,但无明显的发热性中性粒细胞减少或感染。吉西他滨和长春瑞滨的联合方案在标准临床实践中可能是一种有用的方案,并且有可能与生物/靶向治疗有效联合。目前正在进行多项该联合方案与铂类联合方案的随机试验[已校正]。