Lubenko Irene Yu, Vostrov Sergey N, Portnoy Yury A, Zinner Stephen H, Firsov Alexander A
Department of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Gause Institute of New Antibiotics, 11 Bolshaya Pirogovskaya Street, Moscow 119992, Russia.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jul;20(1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(02)00116-4.
To compare the antimicrobial effects (AMEs) of two quinolones in terms of the AUC/MIC- and dose (D)-response relationships, five differentially susceptible clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were exposed to decreasing concentrations of ciprofloxacin (two 12-h doses with T(1/2) = 4 h) and trovafloxacin (a single dose with T(1/2) = 9.2 h). The simulated AUC/MICs of ciprofloxacin ranged from 58 to 932 and those of trovafloxacin, from 54 to 466 h. The intensity of the AME (I(E)) correlated well with log AUC/MIC for both ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin (r(2) = 0.99 and 0.97, respectively) in a strain-independent fashion. At a given AUC/MIC ratio, AMEs of trovafloxacin were greater than ciprofloxacin. However, based on the respective I(E)-logD curves, 200 mg trovafloxacin produced a slightly greater AME than 2 x 500 mg ciprofloxacin only with the most susceptible P. aeruginosa. With the less susceptible P. aeruginosa ciprofloxacin was more efficient than trovafloxacin. This study suggests that both bacterial strain-independent AUC/MIC- and the respective strain-specific dose-response relationships of the AME are important for comprehensive pharmacodynamic evaluation of antimicrobial agents.
为了比较两种喹诺酮类药物在AUC/MIC与剂量(D)反应关系方面的抗菌效果(AMEs),将五株对药物敏感性不同的铜绿假单胞菌临床分离株分别暴露于浓度逐渐降低的环丙沙星(两剂12小时给药,T(1/2)=4小时)和曲伐沙星(一剂给药,T(1/2)=9.2小时)中。环丙沙星模拟的AUC/MIC范围为58至932,曲伐沙星的模拟AUC/MIC范围为54至466小时。环丙沙星和曲伐沙星的抗菌效果强度(I(E))与log AUC/MIC均呈良好的相关性(r(2)分别为0.99和0.97),且不依赖于菌株。在给定的AUC/MIC比值下,曲伐沙星的AMEs大于环丙沙星。然而,根据各自的I(E)-logD曲线,仅在对药物最敏感的铜绿假单胞菌中,200mg曲伐沙星产生的AME略大于2×500mg环丙沙星。对于敏感性较低的铜绿假单胞菌,环丙沙星比曲伐沙星更有效。本研究表明,不依赖于菌株的AUC/MIC以及AME各自的菌株特异性剂量反应关系对于抗菌药物的全面药效学评价都很重要。