Suppr超能文献

1998年至2001年间,伦敦男同性恋者的高风险性行为有所增加:对艾滋病病毒的乐观态度起到了什么作用?

High-risk sexual behaviour increases among London gay men between 1998 and 2001: what is the role of HIV optimism?

作者信息

Elford Jonathan, Bolding Graham, Sherr Lorraine

机构信息

City University, Istitute of Health Sciences and St Bartholomew School of Nursing and Midwifery, London, UK.

出版信息

AIDS. 2002 Jul 26;16(11):1537-44. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200207260-00011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether HIV optimism (i.e. optimism in the light of new HIV drug therapies) can account for the recent increase in high-risk sexual behaviour among London gay men.

METHODS

Gay men (n = 2938) using London gyms were surveyed annually between 1998 and 2001. Information was collected on HIV status, unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) in the previous 3 months, and agreement with two statements concerning the severity of and susceptibility to HIV infection. Those who agreed were classified as 'optimistic'.

RESULTS

Between 1998 and 2001, the percentage of men reporting high-risk UAI (i.e. UAI with a casual partner of unknown or discordant HIV status) increased: HIV-positive men 15.3-38.8%; HIV-negative men 6.8-12.1%; never-tested men 2.1-7.7%; (P < 0.01). Overall, less than a third were optimistic. In cross-sectional analysis, optimistic HIV-positive and -negative men were more likely to report high-risk UAI than other men (P < 0.05). However, the increase in high-risk UAI between 1998 and 2001 was seen in those who were optimistic and those who were not (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, the modelled increase in high-risk UAI over time remained significant after controlling for HIV optimism (P < 0.01), with no significant interaction between optimism and time.

CONCLUSION

Among London gay men, no difference was detected between those who were optimistic and those who were not in the rate of increase in high-risk sexual behaviour between 1998 and 2001. Our findings suggest that HIV optimism is unlikely to explain the recent increase in high-risk sexual behaviour in these men.

摘要

目的

探讨对艾滋病病毒的乐观态度(即鉴于新型艾滋病病毒药物疗法而产生的乐观情绪)是否能解释伦敦男同性恋者近期高危性行为增加的现象。

方法

1998年至2001年期间,每年对使用伦敦健身房的男同性恋者(n = 2938)进行调查。收集有关艾滋病病毒感染状况、过去3个月内的无保护肛交情况以及对两条关于艾滋病病毒感染严重性和易感性的陈述的认同情况等信息。认同这些陈述的人被归类为“乐观者”。

结果

1998年至2001年期间,报告高危无保护肛交行为(即与艾滋病病毒感染状况未知或不一致的性伴侣进行无保护肛交)的男性比例有所增加:艾滋病病毒呈阳性的男性从15.3%增至38.8%;艾滋病病毒呈阴性的男性从6.8%增至12.1%;从未接受检测的男性从2.1%增至7.7%;(P < 0.01)。总体而言,不到三分之一的人持乐观态度。在横断面分析中,持乐观态度的艾滋病病毒呈阳性和呈阴性的男性比其他男性更有可能报告高危无保护肛交行为(P < 0.05)。然而,1998年至2001年期间,高危无保护肛交行为的增加在持乐观态度和不持乐观态度的人群中均有出现(P < 0.05)。在多变量分析中,在控制了对艾滋病病毒的乐观态度后,高危无保护肛交行为随时间的模拟增加仍具有显著性(P < 0.01),且乐观态度与时间之间无显著交互作用。

结论

在伦敦男同性恋者中,1998年至2001年期间,持乐观态度者与不持乐观态度者在高危性行为增加率方面未发现差异。我们的研究结果表明,对艾滋病病毒的乐观态度不太可能解释这些男性近期高危性行为的增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验