Meirer Romed, Babuccu Orhan, Unsal Murat, Nair Dileep R, Gurunluoglu Raffi, Skugor Blazenka, Meirer Bettina, Siemionow Maria
Departments of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Neurology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195, USA.
Ann Plast Surg. 2002 Jul;49(1):96-103. doi: 10.1097/00000637-200207000-00015.
An experimental study was conducted to investigate the effect of chronic cyclosporine A (CsA) administration with different doses on peripheral nerve regeneration. Forty adult male Lewis rats weighing 150 to 200 g were used. The right sciatic nerve was transected 1 cm distal to the sciatic notch, and a conventional end-to-end nerve coaptation was performed. According to the daily dose of subcutaneous CsA injections, animals were randomized into one control group and four experimental groups of 8 animals each (group I, control with no treatment; group II, 2 mg per kilogram CsA; group III, 4 mg per kilogram CsA; group IV, 8 mg per kilogram CsA; and group V, 16 mg per kilogram CsA). Daily injections of CsA were administered for 12 weeks by an investigator blinded to the different treatment groups. At 3, 6, and 12 weeks after nerve repair, motor recovery was evaluated by the toe spread test, and sensory recovery was measured using the pin-prick test and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs). Evaluations were performed by an investigator who was blinded to the treatment groups. At 12 weeks, sciatic nerve samples were harvested for histomorphometric analysis. Motor recovery was retarded regardless of CsA dose at each time point of evaluation. Sensory recovery was only delayed in the 16-mg-per-kilogram CsA treatment group at the 3 week follow-up. SEP results revealed significantly prolonged N2 and P1 latencies in all CsA treatments regardless of dose and time frame of evaluation compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated significantly reduced numbers of myelinated axons, reduced myelin sheath thickness, and reduced diameters in all CsA treatment groups compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Based on these findings in this experimental model of sciatic nerve, the authors conclude that CsA overall had direct deleterious effects on peripheral nerve regeneration as demonstrated by SEP, pin-prick test, toe spread test, and histomorphometric nerve analysis. These adverse effects seemed to be dose related for sensory recovery only at 3 and 6 weeks of CsA exposure after nerve repair. Motor recovery was affected negatively by short- and long-term CsA administration regardless of dose.
进行了一项实验研究,以探讨不同剂量慢性给予环孢素A(CsA)对周围神经再生的影响。使用了40只体重为150至200克的成年雄性Lewis大鼠。将右侧坐骨神经在坐骨切迹远端1厘米处横断,并进行传统的端端神经吻合。根据皮下注射CsA的每日剂量,将动物随机分为1个对照组和4个实验组,每组8只动物(I组,未治疗的对照组;II组,每千克2毫克CsA;III组,每千克4毫克CsA;IV组,每千克8毫克CsA;V组,每千克16毫克CsA)。由对不同治疗组不知情的研究人员每日注射CsA,持续12周。在神经修复后的3、6和12周,通过趾展试验评估运动恢复情况,并使用针刺试验和体感诱发电位(SEP)测量感觉恢复情况。评估由对治疗组不知情的研究人员进行。在12周时,采集坐骨神经样本进行组织形态计量分析。在每个评估时间点,无论CsA剂量如何,运动恢复均延迟。仅在3周随访时,每千克16毫克CsA治疗组的感觉恢复延迟。SEP结果显示,与对照组相比,所有CsA治疗组无论剂量和评估时间范围,N2和P1潜伏期均显著延长(p<0.05)。组织形态计量分析表明,与对照组相比,所有CsA治疗组的有髓轴突数量显著减少、髓鞘厚度降低和直径减小(p<0.05)。基于坐骨神经这个实验模型的这些发现,作者得出结论,如SEP、针刺试验、趾展试验和组织形态计量神经分析所示,CsA总体上对周围神经再生具有直接有害作用。这些不良反应似乎仅在神经修复后CsA暴露3周和6周时与感觉恢复的剂量相关。无论剂量如何,短期和长期给予CsA均对运动恢复产生负面影响。