Lyon Bruce E, Hochachka Wesley M, Eadie John M
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA.
Evolution. 2002 Jun;56(6):1253-66. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01436.x.
Efforts to evaluate the evolutionary and ecological dynamics of conspecific brood parasitism in birds and other animals have focused on the fitness costs of parasitism to hosts and fitness benefits to parasites. However, it has been speculated recently that, in species with biparental care, host males might cooperate with parasitic females by allowing access to the host nest in exchange for copulations. We develop a cost-benefit model to explore the conditions under which such host-parasite cooperation might occur. When the brood parasite does not have a nest of her own, the only benefit to the host male is siring some of the parasitic eggs (quasi-parasitism). Cooperation with the parasite is favored when the ratio of host male paternity of his own eggs relative to his paternity of parasitic eggs exceeds the cost of parasitism. When the brood parasite has a nest of her own, a host male can gain additional, potentially more important benefits by siring the high-value, low-cost eggs laid by the parasite in her own nest. Under these conditions, host males should be even more likely to accept parasitic eggs in return for copulations with the parasitic female. We tested these predictions for American coots (Fulica americana), a species with a high frequency of conspecific brood parasitism. Multilocus DNA profiling indicated that host males did not sire any of the parasitic eggs laid in host nests, nor did they sire eggs laid by the parasite in her own nest. We used field estimates of the model parameters from a four-year study of coots to predict the minimum levels of paternity required for the costs of parasitism to be offset by the benefits of mating with brood parasites. Observed levels of paternity were significantly lower than those predicted under a variety of assumptions, and we reject the hypothesis that host males cooperated with parasitic females. Our model clarifies the specific costs and benefits that influence host-parasite cooperation and, more generally, yields precise predictions about expected levels of host male paternity. These predictions will enable a more rigorous assessment of field studies designed to test adaptive hypotheses of host-parasite cooperation.
评估鸟类和其他动物中同种巢寄生的进化和生态动态的研究工作,主要聚焦于寄生行为对宿主的适合度成本以及对寄生虫的适合度益处。然而,最近有人推测,在双亲共同育雏的物种中,宿主雄性可能会与寄生雌性合作,允许其进入宿主巢穴以换取交配机会。我们构建了一个成本效益模型,以探究这种宿主 - 寄生虫合作可能发生的条件。当巢寄生者没有自己的巢穴时,宿主雄性的唯一好处是使一些寄生卵受精(准寄生)。当宿主雄性对自己卵的父权比例相对于对寄生卵的父权比例超过寄生成本时,与寄生虫的合作就会受到青睐。当巢寄生者有自己的巢穴时,宿主雄性通过使寄生虫在其自己巢穴中产出的高价值、低成本的卵受精,能够获得额外的、可能更重要的益处。在这些条件下,宿主雄性应该更有可能接受寄生卵以换取与寄生雌性的交配。我们针对美洲白骨顶(Fulica americana)这一具有高频率同种巢寄生现象的物种对这些预测进行了检验。多位点DNA分析表明,宿主雄性没有使在宿主巢穴中产下的任何寄生卵受精,也没有使寄生虫在其自己巢穴中产下的卵受精。我们利用对白骨顶进行的为期四年的研究中对模型参数的野外估计值,来预测为使寄生成本被与巢寄生者交配的益处所抵消而所需的最低父权水平。观察到的父权水平显著低于在各种假设下预测的水平,并且我们拒绝宿主雄性与寄生雌性合作的假设。我们的模型阐明了影响宿主 - 寄生虫合作的具体成本和益处,更广泛地说,对宿主雄性父权的预期水平做出了精确预测。这些预测将使对旨在检验宿主 - 寄生虫合作适应性假设的野外研究进行更严格的评估成为可能。