Suppr超能文献

内隐联想测验测量的是什么?对与偏见相关的内隐联想测验的聚合效度和区分效度的一项测试。

What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs.

作者信息

Gawronski Bertram

机构信息

University of Würzburg Lehrstuhl für Psychologie II Röntgenring 10, D-97070 Würzburg Germany.

出版信息

Exp Psychol. 2002;49(3):171-80. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.171.

Abstract

Drawing on recent criticism of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the present study tested the convergent and discriminant validity of two prejudice-related IATs to corresponding explicit prejudice measures in a German student sample (N = 61). Confirming convergent validity, (a) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to Turkish people was significantly related to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (b) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to East Asians was significantly related to explicit prejudice against East Asians. Moreover, confirming discriminant validity, (c) the Asian IAT was unrelated to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (d) the Turkish IAT was unrelated to explicit prejudice against Asian people. These results further corroborate the assumption that the IAT is a valid method to assess the strength of evaluative associations in the domain of prejudice and stereotypes.

摘要

基于近期对内隐联想测验(IAT)的批评,本研究在一个德国学生样本(N = 61)中检验了两个与偏见相关的IAT对相应外显偏见测量的聚合效度和区分效度。证实了聚合效度,(a)一个旨在评估与土耳其人相关的负面联想的IAT与对土耳其人的偏见信念的外显认可显著相关,以及(b)一个旨在评估与东亚人相关的负面联想的IAT与对东亚人的外显偏见显著相关。此外,证实了区分效度,(c)亚洲IAT与对土耳其人的偏见信念的外显认可无关,以及(d)土耳其IAT与对亚洲人的外显偏见无关。这些结果进一步证实了这样一种假设,即IAT是评估偏见和刻板印象领域中评价性联想强度的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验