Dragsted Lars O, Daneshvar Bahram, Vogel Ulla, Autrup Herman N, Wallin Håkan, Risom Lotte, Møller Peter, Mølck Anne M, Hansen Max, Poulsen Henrik E, Loft Steffen
Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Division of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, The Danish Veterinary and Food Administration, DK-2860 Søborg, Denmark.
Cancer Res. 2002 Aug 1;62(15):4339-45.
A sucrose-rich diet has repeatedly been observed to have cocarcinogenic actions in the colon and liver of rats and to increase the number of aberrant crypt foci in rat colon. To investigate whether sucrose-rich diets might directly increase the genotoxic response in the rat colon or liver, we have added sucrose to the diet of Big Blue rats, a strain of Fischer rats carrying 40 copies of the lambda-phage on chromosome 4. Dietary sucrose was provided to the rats for 3 weeks at four dose levels including the background level in the purified diet [3.4% (control), 6.9%, 13.8%, or 34.5%] without affecting the overall energy and carbohydrate intake. We observed a dose-dependent increase in the mutation frequency at the cII site in the colonic mucosa with increased sucrose levels, reaching a 129% increase at the highest dose level. This would indicate a direct or indirect genotoxic effect of a sucrose-rich diet. No significant increase in mutations was observed in the liver. To seek an explanation for this finding, a variety of parameters were examined representing different mechanisms, including increased oxidative stress, changes in oxidative defense, effects on DNA repair, or changes in the background levels of DNA adducts. Sucrose did not increase the number of DNA strand breaks or oxidized bases assessed as endonuclease III-sensitive sites or 8-oxodeoxyguanosine in colon or liver. DNA repair capacity as determined by expression of the rERCC1 or rOGG1 genes was not increased in colon or liver, but the background level of DNA adducts (I-compounds) as determined by (32)P postlabeling was significantly decreased in colon. This decrease in colon I-compounds correlated inversely with both mutation frequency and ERCC1 DNA repair gene expression. Dietary sucrose did not change liver apoptosis or cell turnover as determined by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated biotinylated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling assay and proliferating cell nuclear antigen. An increase in liver ascorbate was also observed, whereas oxidative damage was not observed in proteins or lipids in liver cytosol or in blood plasma. We conclude that a sucrose-rich diet directly or indirectly increases the mutation frequency in rat colon in a dose-dependent manner and concomitantly decreases the level of background DNA adducts, without a direct effect on the expression of major DNA repair enzyme systems. We also conclude that an oxidative mechanism for this effect of sucrose is unlikely. This is the first demonstration of a genotoxic action of increased dietary sucrose in vivo. Both sucrose intake and colon cancer rates are high in the Western world, and our present results call for an examination of a possible direct relationship between the two.
人们反复观察到,富含蔗糖的饮食对大鼠的结肠和肝脏具有促癌作用,并会增加大鼠结肠中异常隐窝病灶的数量。为了研究富含蔗糖的饮食是否可能直接增加大鼠结肠或肝脏中的基因毒性反应,我们在“大蓝鼠”(一种在4号染色体上携带40个λ噬菌体拷贝的Fischer大鼠品系)的饮食中添加了蔗糖。以四种剂量水平(包括纯化饮食中的基础水平[3.4%(对照)、6.9%、13.8%或34.5%])为大鼠提供膳食蔗糖3周,且不影响总体能量和碳水化合物摄入量。我们观察到,随着蔗糖水平升高,结肠黏膜中cII位点的突变频率呈剂量依赖性增加,在最高剂量水平时增加了129%。这表明富含蔗糖的饮食具有直接或间接的基因毒性作用。在肝脏中未观察到突变有显著增加。为了解释这一发现,我们检查了代表不同机制的各种参数,包括氧化应激增加、氧化防御变化、对DNA修复的影响或DNA加合物背景水平的变化。蔗糖并未增加结肠或肝脏中作为核酸内切酶III敏感位点或8-氧代脱氧鸟苷评估的DNA链断裂数或氧化碱基数量。通过rERCC1或rOGG1基因表达确定的DNA修复能力在结肠或肝脏中并未增加,但通过(32)P后标记法确定的结肠中DNA加合物(I-化合物)的背景水平显著降低。结肠中I-化合物的这种减少与突变频率和ERCC1 DNA修复基因表达均呈负相关。通过末端脱氧核苷酸转移酶介导的生物素化脱氧尿苷三磷酸缺口末端标记测定法和增殖细胞核抗原测定,膳食蔗糖并未改变肝脏细胞凋亡或细胞更新。还观察到肝脏中抗坏血酸增加,而在肝脏细胞质或血浆中的蛋白质或脂质中未观察到氧化损伤。我们得出结论,富含蔗糖的饮食以剂量依赖性方式直接或间接增加大鼠结肠中的突变频率,并同时降低背景DNA加合物水平,而对主要DNA修复酶系统的表达没有直接影响。我们还得出结论,蔗糖这种作用的氧化机制不太可能。这是首次在体内证明膳食蔗糖增加具有基因毒性作用。在西方世界,蔗糖摄入量和结肠癌发病率都很高,我们目前的结果呼吁对两者之间可能的直接关系进行研究。