Ugarte F, Hurtado-Coll A
Hospital Angeles del Pedegral, Consultorio 827, Mexico, DF.
Int J Impot Res. 2002 Aug;14 Suppl 2:S48-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900898.
This open-label, multi-center study from Mexico compared the efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil and phentolamine in men with erectile dysfunction. Patients received sildenafil (25-100 mg; n=123) or phentolamine (40 mg; n=119) for 8 weeks, and efficacy was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) as well as two global efficacy questions. Mean scores for the erectile function domain of the IIEF were significantly higher for sildenafil (27.23 +/- 0.62; P=0.0001) than for phentolamine (19.35 +/- 0.66). Approximately twice as many men receiving sildenafil had successful attempts at sexual intercourse (88% vs 42%), improved erections (95% vs 51.1%), and improved ability to have sexual intercourse (94.4% vs 46.4%) compared with phentolamine. The most common adverse events included rhinitis, headache, tachycardia, and nausea, with a higher frequency reported in patients receiving phentolamine than sildenafil (41% vs 33%), with the exception of headache, which was reported more frequently in sildenafil users. Overall, sildenafil was more effective and appeared to be better tolerated than phentolamine for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.
这项来自墨西哥的开放标签、多中心研究比较了口服西地那非和酚妥拉明对勃起功能障碍男性的疗效和安全性。患者接受西地那非(25 - 100毫克;n = 123)或酚妥拉明(40毫克;n = 119)治疗8周,并使用国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)以及两个总体疗效问题评估疗效。西地那非组IIEF勃起功能领域的平均得分(27.23 +/- 0.62;P = 0.0001)显著高于酚妥拉明组(19.35 +/- 0.66)。与酚妥拉明相比,接受西地那非治疗的男性成功性交尝试的人数大约是其两倍(88%对42%),勃起改善的人数比例更高(95%对51.1%),能够进行性交的能力改善的人数比例也更高(94.4%对46.4%)。最常见的不良事件包括鼻炎、头痛、心动过速和恶心,接受酚妥拉明治疗的患者报告的频率高于西地那非(41%对33%),但头痛除外,西地那非使用者报告的频率更高。总体而言,在治疗勃起功能障碍方面,西地那非比酚妥拉明更有效,耐受性似乎也更好。