Weiss Steven J, Arndahl Jeanine, Ernst Amy A, Derlet Robert, Richards John, Nick Todd G
Davis Medical Center, University of California, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Med Sci Monit. 2002 Aug;8(8):CR549-53.
ED overcrowding is fast becoming a national crisis although no definition exists. The purpose of this study is to develop and pilot a sampling form that accurately reflects the concept of ED Overcrowding.
MATERIAL/METHODS: A 26-question site-sampling form was designed based on input from academic physicians at 11 medical schools nationwide. The study was conducted at an inner city Academic medical center. Site-samplings were conducted at 20 times over a one-week period by an independent observer. These times ranged from very slow to severely overcrowded. Information was obtained by counting patients in the waiting room, ED rooms, ED halls and registration/triage, ancillary services, the charge nurse, and the attending physicians. The charge nurse, and ED physicians rated the degree of overcrowding and the ED physician rated the feeling of being rushed. A 'combined outcome variable' was created which consisted of the average responses of nurses and physician's opinion of ED overcrowding and physician's feeling of being rushed. All other data was compared to this outcome variable.
Seven questions were significantly correlated with the combined outcome variable. These were the number of people in the waiting room, patients awaiting triage, patients awaiting registration, full patient rooms, hallway patient, patients awaiting beds, and total registered patients. According to this scale our ED was overcrowded 20% of the time.
This analysis clarifies the definition of overcrowding, helps indicate the variance among responses to overcrowding questions, and provides the foundation for prospective analysis of overcrowding in multiple EDs.
尽管目前尚无关于急诊室过度拥挤的定义,但这一问题正迅速演变为一场全国性危机。本研究旨在开发并试行一种抽样表格,以准确反映急诊室过度拥挤的概念。
材料/方法:基于全国11所医学院校学术医师的意见,设计了一份包含26个问题的现场抽样表格。研究在一家市中心的学术医疗中心开展。由一名独立观察员在一周内的20个不同时段进行现场抽样。这些时段涵盖了从非常冷清到严重拥挤的各种情况。通过统计候诊室、急诊室、急诊大厅以及挂号/分诊处、辅助科室、护士长和主治医生处的患者人数来获取信息。护士长和急诊医生对拥挤程度进行评分,急诊医生对匆忙程度进行评分。创建了一个“综合结果变量”,它由护士和医生对急诊室过度拥挤的意见以及医生匆忙程度的平均回复组成。所有其他数据均与该结果变量进行比较。
七个问题与综合结果变量显著相关。这些问题涉及候诊室的人数、等待分诊的患者、等待挂号的患者、满员的病房、走廊里的患者、等待床位的患者以及总挂号患者数。根据这个量表,我们的急诊室有20%的时间处于过度拥挤状态。
本分析明确了过度拥挤的定义,有助于指出对过度拥挤问题的回答之间的差异,并为多个急诊室过度拥挤的前瞻性分析奠定了基础。