Federlin Marianne, Thonemann Birger, Hiller Karl-Anton, Fertig Christina, Schmalz Gottfried
Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2002 Jun;6(2):84-91. doi: 10.1007/s00784-002-0156-5.
Microleakage at the cervical tooth/restoration interface of class II restorations was evaluated, either on multiple sections or on teeth rendered transparent, in order to determine whether a modified clearing protocol could be established as a routine method for microleakage evaluation in class II restorations. Forty-eight class II cavities were restored with a composite/bonding agent (Tetric Universal/Heliobond, Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) in bulk technique (BT) (n=24) and with a composite/dentin adhesive system (Tetric Universal/Heliobond/Syntac Classic) in increments (IT) (n=24). The 24 specimens were assigned to two groups. Group I: dye penetration (India ink), multiple sectioning (conventional method). Group II: dye penetration (India ink) and modified clearing protocol. Linear microleakage (% dye/section) along the cervical tooth/restoration interface on multiple sections, and microleakage patterns (% dye/surface) at the cervical surface on transparent teeth were evaluated with an image analyzing system. The data were statistically analyzed with the Mann Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, and the error rates method. The application of the modified clearing protocol allowed for distinct evaluation of microleakage patterns. Either protocol revealed lower penetration values for IT than for BT. With the conventional protocol, the median (25-75% percentiles) percentage of dye penetration was 2% (1-46%) for IT and 40% (23-85%) for BT. The clearing protocol revealed dye penetration of 5% (1-22%) for IT and 16% (4-24%) for BT. The clearing protocol together with the use of India ink as tracer allows for evaluation and visualization of the continuous distribution of microleakage at the cervical tooth/restoration interface without loss of information due to sectioning, although this method seems to be less discriminative than the conventional sectioning technique.
为了确定改良的透明化方案是否可以作为二类修复体微渗漏评估的常规方法,对二类修复体牙颈部牙齿/修复体界面的微渗漏进行了评估,评估方式为在多个切片上或在使牙齿透明化后进行。48个二类洞型分别采用整体技术(BT)(n = 24)用复合树脂/粘结剂(Tetric Universal/Heliobond,Vivadent,Schaan,列支敦士登)修复,以及分层技术(IT)(n = 24)用复合树脂/牙本质粘结系统(Tetric Universal/Heliobond/Syntac Classic)修复。24个标本被分为两组。第一组:染料渗透(印度墨水),多切片法(传统方法)。第二组:染料渗透(印度墨水)和改良透明化方案。使用图像分析系统评估多个切片上沿牙颈部牙齿/修复体界面的线性微渗漏(%染料/切片),以及透明牙齿牙颈部表面的微渗漏模式(%染料/表面)。数据采用曼-惠特尼U检验、威尔科克森秩和检验和误差率方法进行统计学分析。改良透明化方案的应用使得微渗漏模式能够得到清晰的评估。两种方案均显示IT组的渗透值低于BT组。采用传统方案时,IT组染料渗透百分比的中位数(25 - 75%百分位数)为2%(1 - 46%),BT组为40%(23 - 85%)。透明化方案显示IT组染料渗透为5%(1 - 22%),BT组为16%(4 - 24%)。透明化方案与使用印度墨水作为示踪剂相结合,可以评估和可视化牙颈部牙齿/修复体界面微渗漏的连续分布,而不会因切片而丢失信息,尽管这种方法似乎比传统切片技术的区分度要低。