Saeed N, Hensher R, McLeod N, Kent J
Specialist Registrar, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham, GL53 7AN, UK.
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002 Aug;40(4):296-9. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(02)00139-0.
The aims of and indications for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) reconstruction are well-established but the method of reconstruction is controversial. We describe a retrospective, two-centre audit of 49 patients treated with costochondral grafting and 50 patients treated with alloplastic joints. The characteristics of the patients were similar in both centres and the minimum follow-up period was 2 years. For each patient a number of variables were recorded including both subjective scores (pain and interference with eating) and objective data (interincisal distance). Patients in both groups showed an improvement in symptoms but more patients required reoperation in the autogenous group.
颞下颌关节(TMJ)重建的目的和适应症已得到充分确立,但重建方法仍存在争议。我们对49例采用肋软骨移植治疗的患者和50例采用人工关节治疗的患者进行了一项回顾性、双中心审计。两个中心患者的特征相似,最短随访期为2年。为每位患者记录了多个变量,包括主观评分(疼痛和对进食的干扰)和客观数据(切牙间距离)。两组患者的症状均有改善,但自体移植组需要再次手术的患者更多。