Yahara Yoshihiro, Ohkubo Yukihiro, Kariwa Hiroaki, Takashima Ikuo
Veterinary Service Center, Nisshin Feed Inc., 5-3-1 Tsurugaoka, Oi-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama 356-8511, Japan.
J Vet Med Sci. 2002 Jul;64(7):583-8. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.583.
To evaluate the immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibody, conventional pigs in PRRSV-positive and -negative commercial farms were examined. Antibody development patterns in ELISA and IFA tests were compared in 3 week old piglets experimentally infected with the PRRSV. The virus was detected from 2 days post infection (PI) and then the antibody titers and S/P ratios rose by both methods. A total of 208 serum samples were collected from 4 PRRSV-negative farms and 210 samples from PRRSV-positive farms, and were tested for the PRRSV antibody by IFA and ELISA. The titer of 64 should be set as the cut-off point in IFA for field sera. Similarly, the cut-off S/P ratio should be set at 0.4 in ELISA. A high degree of correlation was observed between antibody titers by the two methods in these 418 samples, with a correlation coefficient of 0.84. The coincidence rate between the two tests was 84.7% (354/418). In non-coincident cases, ELISA was able to detect the antibody with a low titer in the serum samples which were negative in IFA but from PRRSV positive farms. ELISA was more sensitive than IFA to detect PRRSV infected animals or farms.
为评估免疫荧光抗体(IFA)检测和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)用于检测猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)抗体的效果,对PRRSV阳性和阴性商业猪场的常规猪进行了检测。在实验性感染PRRSV的3周龄仔猪中比较了ELISA和IFA检测中的抗体产生模式。感染后2天(PI)检测到病毒,随后两种方法检测的抗体滴度和S/P比值均升高。从4个PRRSV阴性猪场收集了208份血清样本,从PRRSV阳性猪场收集了210份样本,并通过IFA和ELISA检测PRRSV抗体。对于现场血清,IFA检测的临界值应设定为64。同样,ELISA检测的临界S/P比值应设定为0.4。在这418份样本中,两种方法检测的抗体滴度之间观察到高度相关性,相关系数为0.84。两种检测方法的符合率为84.7%(354/418)。在不符合的情况下,ELISA能够检测到IFA检测为阴性但来自PRRSV阳性猪场的血清样本中低滴度的抗体。ELISA在检测PRRSV感染动物或猪场方面比IFA更敏感。