Suppr超能文献

酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和免疫荧光抗体(IFA)检测法用于检测传统猪场猪群中猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)抗体的评估。

Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test for the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibody in pigs from conventional farms.

作者信息

Yahara Yoshihiro, Ohkubo Yukihiro, Kariwa Hiroaki, Takashima Ikuo

机构信息

Veterinary Service Center, Nisshin Feed Inc., 5-3-1 Tsurugaoka, Oi-machi, Iruma-gun, Saitama 356-8511, Japan.

出版信息

J Vet Med Sci. 2002 Jul;64(7):583-8. doi: 10.1292/jvms.64.583.

Abstract

To evaluate the immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for detecting the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) antibody, conventional pigs in PRRSV-positive and -negative commercial farms were examined. Antibody development patterns in ELISA and IFA tests were compared in 3 week old piglets experimentally infected with the PRRSV. The virus was detected from 2 days post infection (PI) and then the antibody titers and S/P ratios rose by both methods. A total of 208 serum samples were collected from 4 PRRSV-negative farms and 210 samples from PRRSV-positive farms, and were tested for the PRRSV antibody by IFA and ELISA. The titer of 64 should be set as the cut-off point in IFA for field sera. Similarly, the cut-off S/P ratio should be set at 0.4 in ELISA. A high degree of correlation was observed between antibody titers by the two methods in these 418 samples, with a correlation coefficient of 0.84. The coincidence rate between the two tests was 84.7% (354/418). In non-coincident cases, ELISA was able to detect the antibody with a low titer in the serum samples which were negative in IFA but from PRRSV positive farms. ELISA was more sensitive than IFA to detect PRRSV infected animals or farms.

摘要

为评估免疫荧光抗体(IFA)检测和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)用于检测猪繁殖与呼吸综合征病毒(PRRSV)抗体的效果,对PRRSV阳性和阴性商业猪场的常规猪进行了检测。在实验性感染PRRSV的3周龄仔猪中比较了ELISA和IFA检测中的抗体产生模式。感染后2天(PI)检测到病毒,随后两种方法检测的抗体滴度和S/P比值均升高。从4个PRRSV阴性猪场收集了208份血清样本,从PRRSV阳性猪场收集了210份样本,并通过IFA和ELISA检测PRRSV抗体。对于现场血清,IFA检测的临界值应设定为64。同样,ELISA检测的临界S/P比值应设定为0.4。在这418份样本中,两种方法检测的抗体滴度之间观察到高度相关性,相关系数为0.84。两种检测方法的符合率为84.7%(354/418)。在不符合的情况下,ELISA能够检测到IFA检测为阴性但来自PRRSV阳性猪场的血清样本中低滴度的抗体。ELISA在检测PRRSV感染动物或猪场方面比IFA更敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验