相似文献
1
Should insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization be mandated?
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):686-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020087.
2
Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
N Engl J Med. 2002 Aug 29;347(9):661-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa013491.
3
Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):958-9; author reply 958-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200303063481019.
4
Insurance coverage and in vitro fertilization outcomes: a U.S. perspective.
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):964-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.030. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
5
Does insurance coverage decrease the risk for multiple births associated with assisted reproductive technology?
Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00572-7.
6
State Insurance Mandates and Multiple Birth Rates After In Vitro Fertilization.
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1205-1214. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001733.
7
To insure or not to insure: that is the question.
Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):24-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00574-0.
8
Insurance is not a magic bullet for the multiple birth problem associated with assisted reproductive technology.
Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):32-3. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00579-x.
9
To pay or not to pay.
Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):27-9. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00576-4.
10
Impact of insurance coverage on in vitro fertilization practice patterns: a complex relationship.
Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):30-1. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00575-2.
Zotero 插件